$526.0 Million
Harrison Ford Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Harrison Ford has an estimated net worth of $526.0 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | July 13, 1942 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Swedish Hospital |
| Breakthrough | Star Wars (1977) |
| Best Known | Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) |
Who Is Harrison Ford?
Harrison Ford was born July 13, 1942 in Swedish Hospital, best known for Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981). The earnings behind Harrison's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Harrison's earning years from 1966 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2013 at about $34.1 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $526.0 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (1 of 95 films) lương mỗi phim và phụ trợ từ báo cáo được trích dẫn | $10,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (48 of 95 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $340,549,991 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (26 of 95 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $43,194,273 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (20 of 95 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $2,035,097 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 39 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 4 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $31,588,883 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $2.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 0.50x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $8,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 37 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $72,300,897 |
| TV: Ironside Tom Stowe; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: My Friend Tony Himself; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Love, American Style Roger Crane; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Dan August Hewett; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Gunsmoke Hobey / Print; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Kung Fu Mr. Harrison; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Petrocelli Tom Brannigan; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Judgment: The Court Martial of Lieutenant William Calley Frank Crowder; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Dynasty Mark Blackwood; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Frontline Narrator; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Nature Is Speaking The Ocean; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Shrinking Dr. Paul Rhoades; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $20,250,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $403,077,185 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$78,539,522 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của tiểu bang không có thuế thu nhập ở Hoa Kỳ, hàng năm | -$171,193,564 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$150,984,137 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $525,956,777 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Captain America: Brave New World no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1) | 2025 | Lead | $180,000,000 | $415,000,000 | $11,607,143 |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Saving Sakic no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny disclosed: reported eight-figure deal for Dial of Destiny; entered at $10M floor | 2023 | Lead | $295,000,000 | $384,000,000 | $10,000,000 |
| The Call of the Wild no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2020 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $107,604,626 | $16,428,571 |
| Neil Armstrong no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $275,000,000 | $1,074,144,248 | $1,892,308 |
| The Secret Life of Pets 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $80,000,000 | $431,100,000 | $2,400,000 |
| Blade Runner 2049 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2017 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $259,239,658 | $20,000,000 |
| Joan Didion: The Center Will Not Hold no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Spielberg no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Toxic Puzzle - Hunt for the Hidden Killer no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Living in the Age of Airplanes no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $8,011 | $1,320,000 |
| Star Wars: The Force Awakens no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2015 | Lead | $245,000,000 | $2,068,223,624 | $15,769,231 |
| The Age of Adaline no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2015 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $65,663,276 | $3,750,000 |
| Flying the Feathered Edge: The Bob Hoover Project no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Nature Is Speaking no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Shrinking no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Expendables 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.5M | 2014 | Lead | $90,000,000 | $214,700,000 | $13,500,000 |
| 42 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.3M | 2013 | Lead | $35,500,000 | $97,500,000 | $5,325,000 |
| Anchorman 2: Truyền thuyết tiếp tục no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M | 2013 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $173,600,000 | $7,500,000 |
| Drew: The Man Behind the Poster no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Ender's Game no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $16.5M | 2013 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $125,500,000 | $16,500,000 |
| Milius no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Paranoia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.2M | 2013 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $17,100,000 | $5,250,000 |
| Cowboys & Aliens no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2011 | Lead | $163,000,000 | $175,910,315 | $20,000,000 |
| Extraordinary Measures no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $31,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $1,320,000 |
| Morning Glory no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2010 | Lead | $239,000 | $60,000,000 | $35,850 |
| Brüno no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2009 | Supporting | $42,000,000 | $138,800,000 | $2,325,000 |
| Crossing Over no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $3,500,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2008 | Lead | $185,000,000 | $790,653,942 | $11,818,182 |
| Dalai Lama Renaissance no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| Firewall no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $7.5M | 2006 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $82,800,000 | $7,500,000 |
| Empire of Dreams: The Story of the Star Wars Trilogy no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| Wikipedia:Verifiability no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Hollywood Homicide no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.2M | 2003 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $51,100,000 | $11,250,000 |
| K-19: The Widowmaker no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2002 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $65,716,126 | $11,818,181 |
| Lost Worlds: Life in the Balance no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2001 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| What Lies Beneath no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2000 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $291,400,000 | $11,818,179 |
| Random Hearts no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $9.6M | 1999 | Lead | $64,000,000 | $74,600,000 | $9,599,996 |
| Six Days, Seven Nights no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $10.1M | 1998 | Lead | $67,500,000 | $164,800,000 | $10,124,992 |
| The Emperor's New Clothes: An All-Star Illustrated Retelling of the Classic Fairy Tale no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Air Force One no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $12.8M | 1997 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $315,156,409 | $12,749,980 |
| Frontline no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1997 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,998 |
| The Devil's Own no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $12.9M | 1997 | Lead | $86,000,000 | $140,800,000 | $12,899,980 |
| The Immortal Beaver no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1996 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,996 |
| One Hundred and One Nights no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1995 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,992 |
| Sabrina no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $8.1M | 1995 | Lead | $54,000,000 | $87,100,000 | $8,099,952 |
| The World of Jacques Demy no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1995 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,992 |
| Clear and Present Danger no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $9.3M | 1994 | Lead | $62,000,000 | $215,900,000 | $9,299,893 |
| Jimmy Hollywood no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1994 | Supporting | $30,000,000 | $3,800,000 | $1,724,984 |
| The Fugitive (1993 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.6M | 1993 | Lead | $44,000,000 | $368,900,000 | $6,599,855 |
| Patriot Games no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.8M | 1992 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $178,051,587 | $6,749,710 |
| Regarding Henry no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.8M | 1991 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $87,900,000 | $3,749,700 |
| Presumed Innocent no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M | 1990 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $221,000,000 | $2,999,545 |
| Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4) | 1989 | Lead | $48,000,000 | $474,200,000 | $6,331,263 |
| Frantic no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $3.0M | 1988 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $17,600,000 | $2,998,144 |
| Working Girl no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.2M | 1988 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $103,000,000 | $4,197,361 |
| The Mosquito Coast (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $3.8M | 1986 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $14,300,000 | $3,741,119 |
| Witness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.8M | 1985 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $117,100,000 | $1,791,847 |
| Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.2M | 1984 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $333,100,000 | $4,162,348 |
| Return of the Jedi no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.9M | 1983 | Lead | $32,500,000 | $475,100,000 | $4,790,165 |
| Blade Runner no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.5M | 1982 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $41,800,000 | $4,350,450 |
| E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1982 | Supporting | $10,500,000 | $797,300,000 | $481,502 |
| Raiders of the Lost Ark no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $3.0M | 1981 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $389,900,000 | $2,815,379 |
| The Empire Strikes Back no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.7M | 1980 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $547,879,454 | $2,390,445 |
| Apocalypse Now soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.7M vs early terms | 1979 | Lead | $31,500,000 | $150,000,000 | $3,772,354 |
| Hanover Street soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.2M vs early terms | 1979 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $3,000,000 | $971,183 |
| More American Graffiti soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 1979 | Supporting | $2,750,000 | $11,500,000 | $275,501 |
| The Frisco Kid soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.4M vs early terms | 1979 | Lead | $9,200,000 | $9,300,000 | $1,113,633 |
| Force 10 from Navarone soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.6M vs early terms | 1978 | Lead | $10,500,000 | $3,200,000 | $1,075,676 |
| Heroes soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $3,100,000 | $33,500,000 | $266,875 |
| Star Wars soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.6M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $775,400,000 | $876,562 |
| The Possessed soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $261,250 |
| Dynasty soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1976 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $199,359 |
| William Calley soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1975 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $149,064 |
| Kung Fu no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1974 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $114,643 |
| Petrocelli no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1974 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $114,643 |
| The Conversation no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1974 | Lead | $1,600,000 | $4,900,000 | $89,164 |
| American Graffiti no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1973 | Lead | $777,000 | $140,000,000 | $71,856 |
| Dan August no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1971 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $75,675 |
| Gunsmoke no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1971 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $75,675 |
| Getting Straight no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1970 | Lead | $3,025,000 | $13,300,000 | $72,337 |
| The Intruders no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1970 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $72,337 |
| Zabriskie Point no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 1970 | Supporting | $7,000,000 | $1,072,000 | $106,776 |
| Love, American Style no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1969 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $113,440 |
| My Friend Tony no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 1969 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | – | $105,008 |
| The F.B.I. no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1969 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $113,440 |
| Journey to Shiloh no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1968 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $108,433 |
| A Time for Killing no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1967 | Lead | $2,000,000 | – | $69,044 |
| Ironside no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1967 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $105,854 |
| Luv no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 1967 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | $1,000,000 | $103,623 |
| The Virginian no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1967 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $105,854 |
| Dead Heat on a Merry-Go-Round no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate) | 1966 | Supporting | $1,700,000 | – | $68,872 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $6,488,679 | $973,302 | 33% | $2,036,851 | $1,658,452 | $525,956,777 |
| 2025 | $15,634,699 | $2,345,205 | 33% | $4,907,863 | $3,996,098 | $513,892,012 |
| 2024 | $14,704,409 | $2,205,661 | 33% | $4,615,838 | $3,758,323 | $473,287,680 |
| 2023 | $18,980,033 | $2,847,005 | 33% | $5,957,992 | $4,851,137 | $432,713,328 |
| 2022 | $2,207,533 | $331,130 | 33% | $692,963 | $564,227 | $390,581,856 |
| 2021 | $2,312,024 | $346,804 | 33% | $725,764 | $590,934 | $418,534,475 |
| 2020 | $13,785,907 | $2,067,886 | 33% | $4,327,512 | $3,523,562 | $383,547,113 |
| 2019 | $11,203,028 | $1,680,454 | 33% | $3,516,725 | $2,863,400 | $352,220,269 |
| 2018 | $4,499,182 | $674,877 | 33% | $1,412,331 | $1,149,953 | $313,662,570 |
| 2017 | $21,592,092 | $3,238,814 | 42% | $5,867,470 | $4,777,432 | $310,698,140 |
| 2016 | $12,997,085 | $1,949,563 | 42% | $3,531,849 | $2,875,714 | $283,023,591 |
| 2015 | $19,005,949 | $2,850,892 | 42% | $5,164,707 | $4,205,226 | $265,620,255 |
| 2014 | $23,485,946 | $3,522,892 | 42% | $6,382,108 | $5,196,463 | $255,128,908 |
| 2013 | $34,052,214 | $5,107,832 | 42% | $9,253,403 | $7,534,338 | $234,775,789 |
| 2012 | $12,219,578 | $1,832,937 | 37% | $3,606,823 | $2,936,760 | $206,936,170 |
| 2011 | $14,960,650 | $2,244,097 | 37% | $4,415,899 | $3,595,529 | $190,453,802 |
| 2010 | $8,672,695 | $1,300,904 | 37% | $2,559,899 | $2,084,330 | $179,655,179 |
| 2009 | $7,918,841 | $1,187,826 | 37% | $2,337,385 | $1,903,154 | $165,522,237 |
| 2008 | $12,194,576 | $1,829,186 | 37% | $3,599,444 | $2,930,752 | $148,399,592 |
| 2007 | $6,057,355 | $908,603 | 37% | $1,787,935 | $1,455,779 | $159,908,586 |
| 2006 | $6,860,606 | $1,029,091 | 37% | $2,025,029 | $1,648,826 | $151,242,935 |
| 2005 | $3,143,385 | $471,508 | 37% | $927,826 | $755,457 | $139,702,202 |
| 2004 | $6,798,106 | $1,019,716 | 37% | $2,006,581 | $1,633,805 | $133,869,193 |
| 2003 | $11,460,531 | $1,719,080 | 37% | $3,382,777 | $2,754,337 | $125,044,977 |
| 2002 | $13,100,007 | $1,965,001 | 42% | $3,559,817 | $2,898,487 | $110,643,878 |
| 2001 | $6,743,551 | $1,011,533 | 42% | $1,832,503 | $1,492,067 | $111,092,612 |
| 2000 | $10,713,643 | $1,607,047 | 42% | $2,911,343 | $2,370,484 | $109,647,693 |
| 1999 | $12,414,245 | $1,862,137 | 42% | $3,373,467 | $2,746,756 | $105,609,113 |
| 1998 | $14,716,882 | $2,207,532 | 42% | $3,999,189 | $3,256,234 | $95,621,603 |
| 1997 | $25,136,271 | $3,770,441 | 42% | $6,830,570 | $5,561,611 | $82,969,400 |
| 1996 | $10,793,142 | $1,618,971 | 42% | $2,932,946 | $2,388,073 | $68,627,041 |
| 1995 | $10,357,000 | $1,553,550 | 42% | $2,814,428 | $2,291,573 | $61,158,317 |
| 1994 | $13,098,872 | $1,964,831 | 42% | $3,559,509 | $2,898,236 | $51,468,079 |
| 1993 | $9,776,233 | $1,466,435 | 42% | $2,656,609 | $2,163,074 | $47,703,547 |
| 1992 | $8,436,495 | $1,265,474 | 30% | $2,766,867 | $2,252,848 | $42,910,338 |
| 1991 | $6,863,203 | $1,029,480 | 30% | $2,250,884 | $1,832,722 | $38,673,124 |
| 1990 | $5,647,676 | $847,151 | 30% | $1,852,234 | $1,508,133 | $32,832,973 |
| 1989 | $7,345,576 | $1,101,836 | 30% | $2,409,084 | $1,961,533 | $30,491,062 |
| 1988 | $8,396,163 | $1,259,424 | 30% | $2,753,639 | $2,242,078 | $25,412,128 |
| 1987 | $4,115,312 | $617,297 | 36% | $1,233,988 | $1,004,742 | $21,566,174 |
| 1986 | $4,908,895 | $736,334 | 40% | $1,379,949 | $1,123,587 | $19,812,876 |
| 1985 | $5,084,111 | $762,617 | 40% | $1,429,205 | $1,163,692 | $17,120,162 |
| 1984 | $5,890,542 | $883,581 | 40% | $1,655,902 | $1,348,274 | $14,055,406 |
| 1983 | $6,900,108 | $1,035,016 | 40% | $1,939,703 | $1,579,352 | $11,979,300 |
| 1982 | $7,052,372 | $1,057,856 | 40% | $1,982,506 | $1,614,203 | $10,193,529 |
| 1981 | $5,545,369 | $831,805 | 40% | $1,558,870 | $1,269,268 | $8,409,043 |
| 1980 | $5,929,313 | $889,397 | 40% | $1,666,801 | $1,357,149 | $6,998,063 |
| 1979 | $8,615,905 | $1,292,386 | 40% | $2,422,034 | $1,972,077 | $5,528,953 |
| 1978 | $6,044,340 | $906,651 | 40% | $1,699,136 | $1,383,477 | $3,486,279 |
| 1977 | $4,297,003 | $644,550 | 40% | $1,207,939 | $983,532 | $2,061,065 |
| 1976 | $796,312 | $119,447 | 40% | $223,853 | $182,266 | $1,056,146 |
| 1975 | $397,660 | $59,649 | 40% | $111,787 | $91,020 | $856,535 |
| 1974 | $719,537 | $107,931 | 40% | $202,270 | $164,693 | $750,321 |
| 1973 | $289,576 | $43,436 | 40% | $81,403 | $66,281 | $574,004 |
| 1972 | $165,299 | $24,795 | 40% | $56,854 | $27,449 | $497,646 |
| 1971 | $320,993 | $48,149 | 40% | $90,235 | $73,471 | $460,865 |
| 1970 | $276,566 | $41,485 | 42% | $75,154 | $61,192 | $379,705 |
| 1969 | $640,006 | $96,001 | 42% | $173,916 | $141,607 | $312,190 |
| 1968 | $197,509 | $29,626 | 42% | $65,667 | $31,704 | $167,198 |
| 1967 | $567,156 | $85,073 | 42% | $154,120 | $125,488 | $132,804 |
| 1966 | $68,872 | $10,331 | 42% | $26,783 | $7,171 | $7,171 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: long public Wyoming ranch base; WY has no state income tax - using US-no-income-tax-state rates as proxy
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Harrison Ford)
Tái tạo số này. Ước tính giá trị ròng phải được tái tạo theo cách của một phát hiện khoa học: cùng một đầu vào công khai và cùng một tỷ lệ được công bố sẽ luôn đưa ra cùng một câu trả lời. Ngân sách phim và doanh thu phòng vé là báo cáo công khai. Mọi mức lương, mức phí, thuế suất, tỷ lệ tiết kiệm và lợi nhuận chuẩn được tiết lộ đều được công bố kèm theo trích dẫn trên trang web của chúng tôi. trang phương pháp. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $526.0 Million.
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Harrison’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Harrison Ford's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Harrison Ford's net worth is an estimated $526.0 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Harrison Ford make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Harrison Ford's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Harrison actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Harrison Ford make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Harrison lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Harrison Ford rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $526.0 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Harrison Ford's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $340.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Harrison Ford make from endorsements?
The model counts $8.0 Million in career endorsement income for Harrison: 1 named partnerships x the $2.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 0.50x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Harrison Ford
Angelina Jolie
Bruce Willis
Christian Bale
Emma Watson
Hugh Jackman
Jason Statham
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Garner
Jodie Foster
Johnny Depp
Julia Roberts
Leonardo DiCaprio
Margot Robbie
Matt Damon
Mila Kunis
Morgan Freeman
Natalie Portman
Samuel L. Jackson
Sandra Bullock
Scarlett Johansson
Sylvester Stallone
Tom Hanks
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.