Hugh Grant Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Hugh Grant has an estimated net worth of $150.7 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | không có |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | không có |
| Breakthrough | career breakthrough modeled at 1994 |
| Best Known | Notting Hill (1999) |
Who Is Hugh Grant?
Hugh Grant is best known for Notting Hill (1999). The earnings behind Hugh's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Hugh's earning years from 1982 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2023 at about $35.0 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $150.7 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (40 of 72 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $212,585,001 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (8 of 72 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $12,900,635 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (24 of 72 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $6,431,827 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 26 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $13,744,197 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 2 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $27,913,816 |
| TV: Honour, Profit and Pleasure Lord Burlington; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Jenny's War Peter Baines; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $225,000 |
| TV: The Last Place on Earth Apsley Cherry-Garrard; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: Ladies in Charge Gerald Boughton-Green; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: A Very Peculiar Practice Preacher Colin; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Till We Meet Again Bruno de Lancel; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Champagne Charlie Charles Heidsieck; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: The Lady and the Highwayman Lucius Vyne/Silver Blade; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: The Trials of Oz Richard Neville; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Our Sons James Grant; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Performance Alsemero/Richard Neville; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Shakespeare: The Animated Tales Sebastian; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: The Nanny Himself; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Doctor Who and the Curse of Fatal Death The 12th Doctor; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Robbie the Reindeer Blitzen; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Red Nose Day Actually David; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: W1A Himself; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $15,000 |
| TV: A Very English Scandal Jeremy Thorpe; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $225,000 |
| TV: One Red Nose Day and a Wedding Charles; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Undoing Dr. Jonathan Fraser; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: Death to 2020 Tennyson Foss; one engagement for a television film or special; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Death to 2021 Tennyson Foss; one engagement for a television film or special; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: The Regime Edward Keplinger; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $15,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $90,955,742 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$42,847,311 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$109,206,028 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$73,847,322 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $150,703,821 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $7.5M | 2025 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $140,400,000 | $7,500,000 |
| Heretic no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2024 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $60,000,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Paddington in Peru no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $82,500,000 | $211,000,000 | $2,850,000 |
| The Regime no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2024 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Unfrosted no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2023 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $208,200,000 | $16,428,571 |
| Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $7.5M | 2023 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $49,000,000 | $7,500,000 |
| Wonka no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2023 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $634,500,000 | $16,428,571 |
| Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $2,600,000 |
| Death to 2021 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Death to 2020 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| The Undoing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| One Red Nose Day and a Wedding no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M | 2019 | Lead | $4,400,000 | $245,700,000 | $660,000 |
| The Gentlemen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M | 2019 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $115,200,000 | $3,300,000 |
| A Very English Scandal no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Paddington 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $290,100,000 | $5,999,999 |
| Red Nose Day Actually no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,999 |
| W1A no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Supporting | – | – | $600,000 |
| Florence Foster Jenkins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.3M | 2016 | Lead | $29,000,000 | $56,000,000 | $4,349,998 |
| The Man from U.N.C.L.E. no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.9M | 2015 | Lead | $79,500,000 | $110,000,000 | $11,924,990 |
| One Rogue Reporter no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Supporting | – | – | $599,999 |
| The Rewrite no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M | 2014 | Lead | $4,500,000 | $4,500,000 | $674,999 |
| Cloud Atlas no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.5M | 2012 | Lead | $123,350,000 | $130,500,000 | $18,502,389 |
| The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists! no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $55,000,000 | $123,000,000 | $2,399,988 |
| I'm Still Here no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2010 | Supporting | – | $626,000 | $599,989 |
| Did You Hear About the Morgans? no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $8.7M | 2009 | Lead | $58,000,000 | $85,300,000 | $8,699,628 |
| Music and Lyrics no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $145,900,000 | $5,999,050 |
| American Dreamz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2006 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $16,500,000 | $2,549,302 |
| Housewarming no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2005 | Supporting | – | – | $2,248,837 |
| Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.8M | 2004 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $265,100,000 | $6,742,036 |
| Love Actually no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $246,942,017 | $5,986,362 |
| About a Boy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2002 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $130,500,000 | $4,480,706 |
| Robbie the Reindeer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2002 | Lead | – | – | $2,987,838 |
| Two Weeks Notice no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M | 2002 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $199,000,000 | $8,959,160 |
| Bridget Jones's Diary no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M | 2001 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $282,000,000 | $3,719,578 |
| Small Time Crooks no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M | 2000 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $29,900,000 | $3,691,264 |
| Doctor Who and the Curse of Fatal Death no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1999 | Lead | – | – | $2,905,276 |
| Mickey Blue Eyes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.4M | 1999 | Lead | $36,000,000 | $54,300,000 | $5,226,375 |
| Notting Hill no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.3M | 1999 | Lead | $42,000,000 | $364,000,000 | $6,095,374 |
| Extreme Measures soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.7M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $38,000,000 | $17,400,000 | $4,585,900 |
| The Nanny soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 1996 | Supporting | – | – | $1,001,822 |
| An Awfully Big Adventure soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.6M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $413,416 |
| Nine Months soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $12.8M shrunk median for 1990s/tentpole (n=1) vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $138,500,000 | $138,500,000 | $8,588,547 |
| Restoration soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.9M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $1,967,967 |
| Sense and Sensibility soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.4M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $135,000,000 | $1,670,626 |
| The Englishman Who Went Up a Hill But Came Down a Mountain soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | – | $21,000,000 | $2,067,080 |
| Four Weddings and a Funeral soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.7M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $4,400,000 | $245,700,000 | $355,000 |
| Sirens soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | – | – | $1,625,000 |
| Night Train to Venice soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | – | – | $1,182,920 |
| The Remains of the Day (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $23,237,911 | $928,487 |
| Bitter Moon soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 1992 | Lead | $1,900,000 | $1,900,000 | $99,023 |
| Shakespeare: The Animated Tales soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21) | 1992 | Supporting | – | – | $448,178 |
| Impromptu no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1991 | Lead | $4,099,999 | $4,099,999 | $117,350 |
| Our Sons no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1991 | Lead | – | – | $577,808 |
| Performance no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1991 | Lead | $1,500,000 | – | $70,861 |
| The Trials of Oz no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1991 | Lead | – | – | $577,808 |
| The Big Man no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1990 | Lead | – | $475,872 | $428,665 |
| Champagne Charlie no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1989 | Lead | – | – | $202,908 |
| The Lady and the Highwayman no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1989 | Lead | – | – | $202,908 |
| Till We Meet Again no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1989 | Lead | – | – | $202,908 |
| Rowing with the Wind no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1988 | Lead | – | – | $155,229 |
| The Bengali Night no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1988 | Lead | – | – | $155,229 |
| The Dawning no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1988 | Lead | – | – | $155,229 |
| The Lair of the White Worm (film) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1988 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $1,200,000 | $72,909 |
| Maurice no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1987 | Lead | $1,580,000 | $2,950,000 | $70,317 |
| White Mischief no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1987 | Lead | $8,500,000 | $3,100,000 | $114,042 |
| A Very Peculiar Practice no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1986 | Lead | – | – | $117,044 |
| Ladies in Charge no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1986 | Lead | – | – | $117,044 |
| Honour, Profit and Pleasure no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | – | – | $110,288 |
| Jenny's War no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | – | – | $110,288 |
| The Last Place on Earth no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | – | – | $110,288 |
| Privileged no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1982 | Lead | – | – | $104,096 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $1,546,278 | $231,942 | 45% | $487,514 | $235,371 | $150,703,821 |
| 2025 | $7,638,624 | $1,145,794 | 45% | $1,968,366 | $1,602,690 | $147,481,940 |
| 2024 | $16,853,483 | $2,528,022 | 45% | $4,342,907 | $3,536,097 | $135,974,716 |
| 2023 | $34,955,535 | $5,243,330 | 45% | $9,007,552 | $7,334,161 | $122,632,496 |
| 2022 | $14,510,343 | $2,176,551 | 45% | $3,739,112 | $3,044,473 | $105,825,716 |
| 2021 | $3,906,682 | $586,002 | 45% | $1,006,697 | $819,677 | $110,296,280 |
| 2020 | $6,576,772 | $986,516 | 45% | $1,694,742 | $1,379,899 | $100,974,687 |
| 2019 | $5,686,260 | $852,939 | 45% | $1,465,270 | $1,193,057 | $92,706,336 |
| 2018 | $4,285,954 | $642,893 | 45% | $1,104,430 | $899,253 | $82,711,681 |
| 2017 | $8,464,609 | $1,269,691 | 47% | $2,101,895 | $1,711,412 | $81,337,417 |
| 2016 | $6,409,546 | $961,432 | 47% | $1,591,590 | $1,295,910 | $73,994,059 |
| 2015 | $10,014,524 | $1,502,179 | 47% | $2,486,763 | $2,024,781 | $69,106,412 |
| 2014 | $5,007,754 | $751,163 | 47% | $1,243,504 | $1,012,490 | $65,490,698 |
| 2013 | $1,062,347 | $159,352 | 47% | $322,759 | $155,828 | $60,767,731 |
| 2012 | $15,412,006 | $2,311,801 | 43% | $4,115,875 | $3,351,242 | $55,506,651 |
| 2011 | $7,172,413 | $1,075,862 | 43% | $1,915,439 | $1,559,595 | $48,890,501 |
| 2010 | $1,339,363 | $200,904 | 43% | $357,685 | $291,236 | $45,580,610 |
| 2009 | $7,535,874 | $1,130,381 | 43% | $2,012,503 | $1,638,627 | $42,393,625 |
| 2008 | $3,788,934 | $568,340 | 43% | $1,011,859 | $823,879 | $37,201,127 |
| 2007 | $5,291,716 | $793,757 | 43% | $1,413,187 | $1,150,650 | $39,988,181 |
| 2006 | $4,798,846 | $719,827 | 43% | $1,281,563 | $1,043,478 | $37,153,369 |
| 2005 | $3,984,223 | $597,633 | 43% | $1,064,012 | $866,344 | $33,858,590 |
| 2004 | $7,364,222 | $1,104,633 | 43% | $1,966,663 | $1,601,303 | $31,832,893 |
| 2003 | $8,067,584 | $1,210,138 | 43% | $2,154,500 | $1,754,245 | $28,673,949 |
| 2002 | $14,757,625 | $2,213,644 | 46% | $3,733,691 | $3,040,059 | $24,516,896 |
| 2001 | $8,896,848 | $1,334,527 | 46% | $2,250,910 | $1,832,744 | $22,144,037 |
| 2000 | $4,759,188 | $713,878 | 46% | $1,204,078 | $980,389 | $20,320,031 |
| 1999 | $11,921,728 | $1,788,259 | 46% | $3,016,207 | $2,455,866 | $19,038,922 |
| 1998 | $4,622,164 | $693,325 | 46% | $1,169,411 | $952,162 | $15,483,892 |
| 1997 | $4,658,338 | $698,751 | 46% | $1,178,563 | $959,614 | $13,147,229 |
| 1996 | $8,885,269 | $1,332,790 | 46% | $2,247,980 | $1,830,358 | $10,893,909 |
| 1995 | $16,692,029 | $2,503,804 | 46% | $4,223,097 | $3,438,545 | $8,400,845 |
| 1994 | $10,072,025 | $1,510,804 | 46% | $2,548,230 | $2,074,829 | $4,370,073 |
| 1993 | $2,081,054 | $312,158 | 46% | $526,508 | $428,695 | $2,254,306 |
| 1992 | $1,174,403 | $176,161 | 36% | $352,148 | $286,727 | $1,724,621 |
| 1991 | $1,409,428 | $211,414 | 36% | $422,621 | $344,108 | $1,370,413 |
| 1990 | $707,520 | $106,128 | 36% | $212,152 | $172,739 | $920,232 |
| 1989 | $859,014 | $128,852 | 36% | $257,578 | $209,726 | $727,932 |
| 1988 | $563,228 | $84,484 | 36% | $168,886 | $137,511 | $464,407 |
| 1987 | $290,630 | $43,595 | 45% | $91,631 | $44,239 | $305,293 |
| 1986 | $369,169 | $55,375 | 55% | $95,230 | $45,977 | $251,834 |
| 1985 | $1,051,831 | $157,775 | 55% | $221,762 | $180,564 | $189,399 |
| 1984 | $99,259 | $14,889 | 55% | $34,291 | $3,675 | $7,836 |
| 1983 | $0 | $0 | 55% | $0 | $0 | $3,932 |
| 1982 | $104,096 | $15,614 | 55% | $35,963 | $3,854 | $3,854 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Hugh Grant)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Hugh’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hugh Grant's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Hugh Grant's net worth is an estimated $150.7 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Hugh Grant make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Hugh Grant's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Hugh actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Hugh Grant make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Hugh lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Hugh Grant rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $150.7 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Hugh Grant's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $212.6 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Hugh Grant make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Hugh: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.