Jamie Foxx Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jamie Foxx has an estimated net worth of $206.1 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | không có |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | không có |
| Breakthrough | career breakthrough modeled at 2004 |
| Best Known | Ray (2004) |
Who Is Jamie Foxx?
Jamie Foxx is best known for Ray (2004). The earnings behind Jamie's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Jamie's earning years from 1992 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2006 at about $32.2 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $206.1 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (47 of 82 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $278,904,906 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (17 of 82 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $27,776,950 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (18 of 82 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $9,620,552 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 25 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 3 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $18,472,496 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (2 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 3 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $40,319,734 |
| TV: Himself (host) Television special; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| Records and touring (modeled) Unpredictable opened at 597,000 copies in its first week and went double platinum, and Blame It went double platinum on its own and took the R&B Grammy in 2010 after fourteen weeks at the top of the R&B chart. He toured the record through 2006. No royalty or gross figures have been published, so this books modeled music income across those years. (riaa.com) | $23,500,000 |
| Beat Shazam hosting (modeled) He has hosted and executive produced the Fox game show since 2017, and it was renewed for a seventh season in 2024. No fee has been reported by the trades, so this books a modeled host and producer fee across the run. (deadline.com) | $18,000,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $92,752,083 |
| Hidden Valley estate, Thousand Oaks appreciation, estimated documented $10,500,000 purchase in 2007 (bought in 2007 for $10.5M: 17,000 square feet on 40 acres, with a recording studio on site), 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (reviewjournal.com) | $19,044,979 |
| Tarzana house appreciation, estimated documented $930,000 purchase in 1997, sold 2008 for a documented $2,230,000 (bought in 1997 for $930,000 and sold in 2008 for $2.23M), actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (variety.com) | $1,143,900 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$66,132,831 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$166,624,631 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$114,965,529 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $206,103,510 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All-Star Weekend no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,998 |
| Back in Action no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,998 |
| Being Eddie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Supporting | – | – | $2,999,998 |
| Fight For '84 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,998 |
| Geechee no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,998 |
| Tin Soldier no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,998 |
| Jamie Foxx: What Had Happened Was... no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2024 | Supporting | – | – | $2,999,996 |
| Luther: Never Too Much no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2024 | Supporting | – | $202,796 | $2,999,996 |
| Not Another Church Movie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2024 | Lead | $576,242 | $576,242 | $86,436 |
| God Is a Bullet no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2023 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,993 |
| Strays no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $46,000,000 | $36,000,000 | $2,599,994 |
| The Burial no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $4.9M | 2023 | Lead | $32,500,000 | – | $4,874,986 |
| They Cloned Tyrone no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2023 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,993 |
| Day Shift no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5), capped at $15.0M | 2022 | Lead | $100,000,000 | – | $14,999,910 |
| Alert: Missing Persons Unit no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,972 |
| Dad Stop Embarrassing Me! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,972 |
| Người Nhện: Không Đường Về Nhà no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2021 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $1,921,847,111 | $17,999,790 |
| Project Power no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $12.8M | 2020 | Lead | $85,100,000 | – | $12,764,716 |
| Soul no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $150,000,000 | $122,000,000 | $1,971,392 |
| Just Mercy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2019 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $50,000,000 | $3,749,842 |
| Live in Front of a Studio Audience no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2019 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,869 |
| QT8: The First Eight no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2019 | Supporting | – | $101,346 | $599,978 |
| The Black Godfather no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2019 | Supporting | – | – | $599,978 |
| Robin Hood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M | 2018 | Lead | $1,500,000 | $32,056,467 | $224,991 |
| Walk It Talk It no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,746 |
| Baby Driver no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.1M | 2017 | Lead | $34,000,000 | $226,945,087 | $5,099,169 |
| Sleepless no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2017 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $32,900,000 | $4,499,272 |
| Sorry Not Sorry (Demi Lovato song) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,505 |
| Welcome to My Life no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Supporting | – | – | $599,918 |
| White Famous no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Supporting | – | – | $599,918 |
| Beat Shazam no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2016 | Supporting | – | – | $599,841 |
| Jackie Robinson no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2016 | Supporting | – | – | $599,841 |
| A Million Ways to Die in the West no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $87,200,000 | $1,318,672 |
| Annie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $10.7M | 2014 | Lead | $71,500,000 | $136,900,000 | $10,712,004 |
| Horrible Bosses 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.3M | 2014 | Lead | $42,000,000 | $107,700,000 | $6,292,342 |
| Rio 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $116,500,000 | $498,700,000 | $2,397,585 |
| The Amazing Spider-Man 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2014 | Lead | $246,500,000 | $717,000,000 | $15,749,689 |
| ...And She Was My Eve no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,992,891 |
| White House Down no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $205,366,737 | $19,951,784 |
| Django Unchained no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $15.0M | 2012 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $449,800,000 | $14,930,331 |
| Horrible Bosses no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.4M | 2011 | Lead | $36,000,000 | $209,800,000 | $5,352,256 |
| Nite Tales: The Series no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2011 | Lead | – | – | $2,973,217 |
| Rio no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $90,000,000 | $483,900,000 | $2,382,300 |
| Due Date no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.8M | 2010 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $211,780,824 | $9,583,628 |
| I'm Still Here no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2010 | Supporting | – | $626,000 | $591,457 |
| Valentine's Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.8M | 2010 | Lead | $52,000,000 | $216,500,000 | $7,668,701 |
| We Are the World 25 for Haiti no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2010 | Lead | – | – | $2,948,290 |
| Yes (LMFAO song) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2010 | Lead | – | – | $2,948,290 |
| Law Abiding Citizen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $8.0M | 2009 | Lead | $53,000,000 | $127,944,208 | $7,693,383 |
| The Soloist no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M | 2009 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $38,300,000 | $8,707,216 |
| Elmo's Christmas Countdown no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2007 | Supporting | – | – | $2,037,670 |
| The Kingdom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.7M | 2007 | Lead | $71,250,000 | $86,800,000 | $9,473,120 |
| Dreamgirls soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.6M vs early terms | 2006 | Lead | $77,500,000 | $155,400,000 | $9,304,230 |
| Miami Vice soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2006 | Lead | $142,500,000 | $164,200,000 | $9,414,443 |
| Sesame Street soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2006 | Supporting | – | – | $1,878,416 |
| Gold Digger (Kanye West song) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | – | – | $2,141,290 |
| Jarhead soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.8M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $72,000,000 | $97,100,000 | $7,305,791 |
| Stealth soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $135,000,000 | $79,300,000 | $7,909,170 |
| Breakin' All the Rules soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $12,500,000 | $984,375 |
| Chappelle's Show soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $1,734,375 |
| Collateral soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.8M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $220,000,000 | $5,125,000 |
| Ray soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $124,000,000 | $3,242,188 |
| Redemption: The Stan Tookie Williams Story soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $1,734,375 |
| Slow Jamz soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $1,734,375 |
| Jamie Foxx Unleashed: Lost, Stolen and Leaked! soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2003 | Supporting | – | – | $1,073,028 |
| Shade soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $458,144 | $818,595 |
| Jamie Foxx: I Might Need Security soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21) | 2002 | Supporting | – | – | $840,334 |
| Ali no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2001 | Lead | $112,500,000 | $87,700,000 | $1,668,997 |
| Bait no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2000 | Lead | $51,000,000 | $15,500,000 | $964,530 |
| Held Up no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2000 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $516,259 |
| Any Given Sunday no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1999 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $100,200,000 | $636,600 |
| The Players Club no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1998 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $23,300,000 | $258,993 |
| Booty Call no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1997 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $20,100,000 | $257,453 |
| 1, 2, 3, 4 (Sumpin' New) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1996 | Lead | – | – | $263,213 |
| Hangin' with Mr. Cooper no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1996 | Lead | – | – | $263,213 |
| Moesha no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1996 | Lead | – | – | $263,213 |
| Saturday Night Live no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1996 | Supporting | – | – | $254,565 |
| The Great White Hype no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1996 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $8,000,000 | $254,565 |
| The Jamie Foxx Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1996 | Lead | – | – | $263,213 |
| The Truth About Cats & Dogs no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1996 | Lead | $59,000,000 | $59,000,000 | $405,768 |
| Jamie Foxx: Straight from the Foxxhole no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1993 | Supporting | – | – | $250,620 |
| Toys no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1992 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $23,300,000 | $367,393 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $1,679,462 | $251,919 | 45% | $529,504 | $255,644 | $206,103,510 |
| 2025 | $16,337,424 | $2,450,614 | 45% | $4,209,925 | $3,427,820 | $181,974,013 |
| 2024 | $14,345,024 | $2,151,754 | 45% | $3,696,512 | $3,009,787 | $166,423,722 |
| 2023 | $17,987,643 | $2,698,146 | 45% | $4,635,164 | $3,774,059 | $151,314,313 |
| 2022 | $21,495,862 | $3,224,379 | 45% | $5,539,183 | $4,510,133 | $135,418,721 |
| 2021 | $27,065,091 | $4,059,764 | 45% | $6,974,295 | $5,678,635 | $140,480,207 |
| 2020 | $21,480,411 | $3,222,062 | 45% | $5,535,201 | $4,506,891 | $124,332,926 |
| 2019 | $14,100,344 | $2,115,052 | 45% | $3,633,461 | $2,958,450 | $111,538,294 |
| 2018 | $8,686,868 | $1,303,030 | 45% | $2,238,484 | $1,822,627 | $98,136,811 |
| 2017 | $14,535,002 | $2,180,250 | 47% | $3,609,268 | $2,938,751 | $95,754,976 |
| 2016 | $7,794,585 | $1,169,188 | 47% | $1,935,517 | $1,575,943 | $86,251,334 |
| 2015 | $3,489,840 | $523,476 | 47% | $866,582 | $705,591 | $80,491,905 |
| 2014 | $28,674,590 | $4,301,189 | 47% | $7,120,348 | $5,797,555 | $77,894,072 |
| 2013 | $29,258,437 | $4,388,765 | 47% | $7,265,326 | $5,915,599 | $67,947,634 |
| 2012 | $19,551,127 | $2,932,669 | 43% | $5,221,254 | $4,251,267 | $56,807,167 |
| 2011 | $15,220,206 | $2,283,031 | 43% | $4,064,653 | $3,309,536 | $49,265,921 |
| 2010 | $25,119,139 | $3,767,871 | 43% | $6,708,227 | $5,461,996 | $44,256,919 |
| 2009 | $25,503,196 | $3,825,479 | 43% | $6,810,792 | $5,545,507 | $36,314,421 |
| 2008 | $8,030,370 | $1,204,555 | 43% | $2,144,562 | $1,746,152 | $28,085,839 |
| 2007 | $19,227,263 | $2,884,089 | 43% | $5,134,764 | $4,180,845 | $28,954,256 |
| 2006 | $32,166,231 | $4,824,935 | 43% | $8,590,198 | $6,994,341 | $23,699,129 |
| 2005 | $30,192,437 | $4,528,866 | 43% | $8,063,084 | $6,565,152 | $15,663,315 |
| 2004 | $23,948,191 | $3,592,229 | 43% | $6,395,518 | $5,207,381 | $8,778,451 |
| 2003 | $5,954,315 | $893,147 | 43% | $1,590,138 | $1,294,728 | $3,387,076 |
| 2002 | $1,358,334 | $203,750 | 46% | $343,660 | $279,816 | $1,905,589 |
| 2001 | $1,570,918 | $235,638 | 46% | $397,443 | $323,608 | $1,676,279 |
| 2000 | $1,676,188 | $251,428 | 46% | $424,077 | $345,293 | $1,353,253 |
| 1999 | $969,275 | $145,391 | 46% | $245,227 | $199,670 | $992,287 |
| 1998 | $437,853 | $65,678 | 46% | $135,537 | $65,437 | $740,081 |
| 1997 | $311,553 | $46,733 | 46% | $112,801 | $30,202 | $610,367 |
| 1996 | $1,468,501 | $220,275 | 46% | $371,532 | $302,510 | $518,581 |
| 1995 | $604,165 | $90,625 | 46% | $187,019 | $90,293 | $200,272 |
| 1994 | $13,840 | $2,076 | 46% | $5,738 | $615 | $96,854 |
| 1993 | $264,461 | $39,669 | 46% | $95,750 | $25,637 | $94,523 |
| 1992 | $367,393 | $55,109 | 36% | $134,787 | $65,075 | $65,075 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: Hidden Valley base in Thousand Oaks since 2007
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Jamie Foxx)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Jamie’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jamie Foxx's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jamie Foxx's net worth is an estimated $206.1 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jamie Foxx make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Jamie Foxx's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Jamie actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Jamie Foxx make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Jamie lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Jamie Foxx rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $206.1 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jamie Foxx's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $278.9 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jamie Foxx make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jamie: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.