Jane Fonda Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jane Fonda has an estimated net worth of $345.2 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ

Fast Facts
| Birthdate | December 21, 1937 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | New York City |
| Breakthrough | Cat Ballou (1965) |
| Best Known | 9 to 5 (1980) |
Who Is Jane Fonda?
Jane Fonda was born December 21, 1937 in New York City, best known for 9 to 5 (1980). The earnings behind Jane's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Jane's earning years from 1955 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2020 at about $25.4 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $345.2 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (81 of 115 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $274,391,202 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (13 of 115 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $28,055,287 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (21 of 115 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $4,202,114 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 72 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 50 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $10,869,001 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 70 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $25,613,865 |
| TV: A String of Beads Gloria Winters; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Lily for President? Judy Bernly; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: 9 to 5 O'Neil; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: The Dollmaker Gertie Nevels; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: The Newsroom Leona Lansing; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $749,250 |
| TV: The Simpsons Maxine Lombard; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Grace and Frankie Grace Hanson; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $49,937,500 |
| TV: Elena and the Secret of Avalor Shuriki; one engagement for a television film or special; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $35,000 |
| TV: Elena of Avalor Shuriki; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $120,000 |
| TV: The Ellen DeGeneres Show Herself (guest host); guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Herself (contestant); guest default per credited year; reality format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Make It Work! Herself; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Stoner Cats Ms. Stoner; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $48,000 |
| TV: The Comeback Herself; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $261,763,490 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$60,788,409 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$158,301,590 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$102,773,023 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $345,156,524 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaslit no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| The Comeback no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Greatest Love Story Never Told no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| This Is Me... Now: A Love Story no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| To be announced no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| 80 for Brady no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $4.2M | 2023 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $40,400,000 | $4,200,000 |
| Book Club: The Next Chapter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2023 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $29,100,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $46,200,000 | $2,850,000 |
| Luck no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $140,000,000 | – | $1,971,429 |
| Moving On no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2022 | Lead | $2,100,000 | $2,100,000 | $315,000 |
| 9to5: The Story of a Movement no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Make It Work! no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Stoner Cats no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Ellen DeGeneres Show no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Alan Pakula: Going for Truth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Book Club no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2018 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $104,400,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Jane Fonda in Five Acts no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Our Souls at Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Elena and the Secret of Avalor no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Elena of Avalor no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Fathers and Daughters no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.4M | 2015 | Lead | $22,400,000 | $5,100,000 | $3,360,000 |
| Youth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $24,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Better Living Through Chemistry no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $120,823 | $1,320,000 |
| Grace and Frankie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Simpsons no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $2,400,000 |
| This Is Where I Leave You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2014 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $40,996,320 | $2,850,000 |
| The Butler no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2013 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $177,300,000 | $4,500,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Am/Pm Yoga for Beginners no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| All Together no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2011 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $11,100,000 | $1,050,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time: Firm & Burn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time: Trim, Tone & Flex no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Miss Representation no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2011 | Lead | $750,000 | – | $112,500 |
| Peace, Love & Misunderstanding no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2011 | Lead | $542,762 | $542,762 | $81,414 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time: Fit and Strong no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time: Walkout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| 33 Variations no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Georgia Rule no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.0M | 2007 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $25,000,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Monster-in-Law no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.5M | 2005 | Lead | $43,000,000 | $155,400,000 | $6,450,000 |
| V-Day: Until the Violence Stops no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Searching for Debra Winger no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Generation 2000: Changing Girls' Realities no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2000 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Personal Trainer Series: Abs, Buns & Thighs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Personal Trainer Series: Low Impact Aerobics & Stretch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Personal Trainer Series: Total Body Sculpting no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Step and Stretch Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Favorite Fat Burners no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Pregnancy Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Yoga Exercise Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Step Aerobic and Abdominal Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,999 |
| Jane Fonda's Lower Body Solution no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,998 |
| Jane Fonda's Lean Routine no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout Presents Fun House Fitness: The Fun House Funk no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout Presents Fun House Fitness: The Swamp Stomp no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Stanley & Iris no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.5M | 1990 | Lead | $23,000,000 | $5,800,000 | $3,449,997 |
| The Earth Day Special no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Jane Fonda's Light Aerobics and Stress Reduction Program no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,997 |
| Old Gringo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $3.9M | 1989 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $3,574,256 | $3,899,994 |
| Jane Fonda's Complete Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1988 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,994 |
| Jane Fonda's Sports Aid no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,988 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout with Weights no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,988 |
| Start Up with Jane Fonda no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,988 |
| Jane Fonda's Low Impact Aerobic Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,976 |
| The Morning After no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.2M | 1986 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $25,100,000 | $2,249,974 |
| Agnes of God no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.1M | 1985 | Lead | $7,500,000 | $25,600,000 | $1,124,976 |
| Jane Fonda's New Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,953 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,909 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout Challenge no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,909 |
| Terror in the Aisles no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $10,004,817 | $2,099,909 |
| The Dollmaker no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,909 |
| The Newsroom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,909 |
| Jane Fonda's Pregnancy, Birth and Recovery Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1983 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,823 |
| 9 to 5 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,656 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,656 |
| Lily for President? no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,656 |
| On Golden Pond no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.1M | 1981 | Lead | $7,500,000 | $119,300,000 | $1,124,657 |
| Rollover no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.4M | 1981 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $10,851,261 | $2,399,230 |
| Sois belle et tais-toi (Be Pretty and Shut Up) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1981 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,330 |
| 9 to 5 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.5M | 1980 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $103,300,000 | $1,499,088 |
| The China Syndrome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $0.9M | 1979 | Lead | $5,900,000 | $51,700,000 | $884,006 |
| The Electric Horseman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.9M | 1979 | Lead | $12,500,000 | $61,800,000 | $1,872,748 |
| California Suite no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1978 | Lead | $3,025,000 | $42,900,000 | $452,798 |
| Comes a Horseman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.6M | 1978 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $9,585,769 | $1,646,175 |
| Coming Home no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1978 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $32,700,000 | $449,057 |
| Fun with Dick and Jane no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.7M | 1977 | Lead | $4,500,000 | $13,600,000 | $672,087 |
| Julia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.2M | 1977 | Lead | $7,840,000 | $20,714,400 | $1,170,845 |
| The Blue Bird no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.8M | 1976 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $3,500,000 | $1,784,192 |
| Introduction to the Enemy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1974 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $440,489 |
| Steelyard Blues no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1973 | Lead | $3,025,000 | $1,000,000 | $428,737 |
| F.T.A. no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1972 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $407,857 |
| Letter to Jane no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1972 | Supporting | $3,025,000 | – | $298,858 |
| Tout Va Bien no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1972 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $407,857 |
| Klute soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.4M vs early terms | 1971 | Lead | $2,500,000 | $12,500,000 | $311,114 |
| They Shoot Horses, Don't They? soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.7M vs early terms | 1969 | Lead | $4,860,000 | $12,600,000 | $398,875 |
| Barbarella soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.0M vs early terms | 1968 | Lead | $6,500,000 | $5,500,000 | $398,903 |
| Spirits of the Dead soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 1968 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $831,439 |
| Barefoot in the Park soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 1967 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $30,000,000 | $116,991 |
| Hurry Sundown soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.6M vs early terms | 1967 | Lead | $3,785,000 | $4,050,000 | $172,846 |
| Any Wednesday no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1966 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $1,500,000 | $359,039 |
| The Chase no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1966 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $3,300,000 | $359,039 |
| The Game Is Over no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1966 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $359,039 |
| Cat Ballou no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1965 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $20,700,000 | $242,606 |
| Circle of Love no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1964 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $177,075 |
| In the Cool of the Day no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1963 | Lead | $1,500,000 | – | $71,560 |
| Strange Interlude no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1963 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $141,739 |
| Sunday in New York no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1963 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $72,909 |
| Period of Adjustment no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1962 | Lead | $1,900,000 | $4,000,000 | $70,765 |
| The Chapman Report no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1962 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $2,500,000 | $123,125 |
| The Fun Couple no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1962 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $123,125 |
| Walk on the Wild Side no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1962 | Lead | $4,500,000 | $3,000,000 | $74,398 |
| A String of Beads no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1961 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $113,440 |
| Invitation to a March no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1960 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $108,433 |
| Tall Story no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1960 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $1,700,000 | $108,433 |
| There Was a Little Girl no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1960 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $108,433 |
| The Country Girl no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1955 | Lead | $2,500,000 | – | $68,777 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $10,736,081 | $1,610,412 | 45% | $2,766,538 | $2,252,580 | $345,156,524 |
| 2025 | $5,302,308 | $795,346 | 45% | $1,366,331 | $1,112,499 | $336,097,961 |
| 2024 | $23,227,250 | $3,484,088 | 45% | $5,985,337 | $4,873,402 | $312,241,480 |
| 2023 | $17,263,577 | $2,589,536 | 45% | $4,448,582 | $3,622,140 | $284,609,691 |
| 2022 | $14,294,258 | $2,144,139 | 45% | $3,683,430 | $2,999,136 | $257,902,327 |
| 2021 | $10,524,282 | $1,578,642 | 45% | $2,711,960 | $2,208,142 | $273,540,901 |
| 2020 | $25,351,111 | $3,802,667 | 45% | $6,532,626 | $5,319,018 | $250,261,146 |
| 2019 | $16,507,941 | $2,476,191 | 45% | $4,253,865 | $3,463,597 | $228,000,759 |
| 2018 | $12,613,071 | $1,891,961 | 45% | $3,250,212 | $2,646,399 | $202,941,544 |
| 2017 | $11,808,471 | $1,771,271 | 47% | $2,932,227 | $2,387,489 | $199,132,213 |
| 2016 | $9,033,203 | $1,354,980 | 47% | $2,243,085 | $1,826,373 | $182,828,971 |
| 2015 | $12,950,250 | $1,942,537 | 47% | $3,215,749 | $2,618,338 | $172,059,955 |
| 2014 | $12,715,228 | $1,907,284 | 47% | $3,157,390 | $2,570,821 | $165,423,076 |
| 2013 | $7,983,586 | $1,197,538 | 47% | $1,982,449 | $1,614,157 | $153,480,722 |
| 2012 | $6,574,257 | $986,139 | 43% | $1,755,697 | $1,429,530 | $139,075,067 |
| 2011 | $11,754,856 | $1,763,228 | 43% | $3,139,210 | $2,556,018 | $129,028,981 |
| 2010 | $12,828,965 | $1,924,345 | 43% | $3,426,057 | $2,789,576 | $121,795,997 |
| 2009 | $8,097,111 | $1,214,567 | 43% | $2,162,385 | $1,760,665 | $111,397,289 |
| 2008 | $2,025,763 | $303,864 | 43% | $540,993 | $440,489 | $100,076,218 |
| 2007 | $2,469,578 | $370,437 | 43% | $659,517 | $536,994 | $109,525,920 |
| 2006 | $1,244,052 | $186,608 | 43% | $332,232 | $270,511 | $104,262,698 |
| 2005 | $4,919,035 | $737,855 | 43% | $1,313,660 | $1,069,613 | $97,508,710 |
| 2004 | $2,278,699 | $341,805 | 43% | $608,541 | $495,489 | $93,050,209 |
| 2003 | $4,583,132 | $687,470 | 43% | $1,223,955 | $996,573 | $87,785,967 |
| 2002 | $6,297,256 | $944,588 | 46% | $1,593,211 | $1,297,230 | $79,042,715 |
| 2001 | $2,052,889 | $307,933 | 46% | $519,382 | $422,893 | $80,160,728 |
| 2000 | $1,981,694 | $297,254 | 46% | $501,370 | $408,227 | $79,772,136 |
| 1999 | $1,063,347 | $159,502 | 46% | $269,028 | $219,049 | $78,129,848 |
| 1998 | $375,377 | $56,307 | 46% | $116,198 | $56,100 | $72,746,693 |
| 1997 | $543,096 | $81,464 | 46% | $168,115 | $81,166 | $65,765,041 |
| 1996 | $613,912 | $92,087 | 46% | $190,036 | $91,749 | $58,711,581 |
| 1995 | $8,886,835 | $1,333,025 | 46% | $2,248,376 | $1,830,681 | $54,333,691 |
| 1994 | $6,861,165 | $1,029,175 | 46% | $1,735,880 | $1,413,395 | $46,237,016 |
| 1993 | $9,909,753 | $1,486,463 | 46% | $2,507,175 | $2,041,401 | $44,024,143 |
| 1992 | $6,837,739 | $1,025,661 | 36% | $2,050,315 | $1,669,415 | $39,660,332 |
| 1991 | $4,527,603 | $679,140 | 36% | $1,357,614 | $1,105,402 | $36,208,016 |
| 1990 | $15,052,591 | $2,257,889 | 36% | $4,513,561 | $3,675,048 | $31,474,601 |
| 1989 | $10,381,994 | $1,557,299 | 36% | $3,113,070 | $2,534,735 | $27,072,072 |
| 1988 | $3,803,695 | $570,554 | 36% | $1,140,549 | $928,662 | $21,989,906 |
| 1987 | $5,591,605 | $838,741 | 45% | $1,440,878 | $1,173,197 | $19,669,398 |
| 1986 | $5,480,607 | $822,091 | 55% | $1,155,498 | $940,834 | $17,842,927 |
| 1985 | $4,057,725 | $608,659 | 55% | $855,506 | $696,573 | $15,550,827 |
| 1984 | $8,851,859 | $1,327,779 | 55% | $1,866,273 | $1,519,563 | $13,173,476 |
| 1983 | $5,143,165 | $771,475 | 55% | $1,084,354 | $882,907 | $11,014,447 |
| 1982 | $5,852,290 | $877,844 | 55% | $1,233,862 | $1,004,639 | $9,930,449 |
| 1981 | $6,401,334 | $960,200 | 55% | $1,349,619 | $1,098,891 | $8,748,650 |
| 1980 | $3,189,359 | $478,404 | 55% | $672,425 | $547,504 | $7,497,925 |
| 1979 | $2,702,117 | $405,318 | 55% | $569,698 | $463,862 | $6,812,468 |
| 1978 | $2,780,303 | $417,046 | 55% | $586,182 | $477,284 | $6,222,599 |
| 1977 | $2,146,772 | $322,016 | 55% | $452,613 | $368,528 | $5,631,282 |
| 1976 | $1,873,247 | $280,987 | 55% | $394,944 | $321,573 | $5,158,299 |
| 1975 | $618,987 | $92,848 | 55% | $130,503 | $106,259 | $4,740,726 |
| 1974 | $406,785 | $61,018 | 55% | $85,764 | $69,831 | $4,542,482 |
| 1973 | $552,014 | $82,802 | 55% | $116,383 | $94,762 | $4,383,877 |
| 1972 | $5,040,284 | $756,043 | 55% | $1,062,663 | $865,245 | $4,203,985 |
| 1971 | $4,692,915 | $703,937 | 55% | $989,426 | $805,614 | $3,272,472 |
| 1970 | $4,242,767 | $636,415 | 54% | $914,398 | $744,524 | $2,417,895 |
| 1969 | $4,421,161 | $663,174 | 54% | $952,845 | $775,829 | $1,640,158 |
| 1968 | $1,096,507 | $164,476 | 54% | $236,318 | $192,416 | $847,174 |
| 1967 | $667,368 | $100,105 | 54% | $143,831 | $117,110 | $641,762 |
| 1966 | $923,250 | $138,488 | 54% | $198,978 | $162,013 | $514,239 |
| 1965 | $564,507 | $84,676 | 54% | $121,662 | $99,060 | $345,235 |
| 1964 | $258,072 | $38,711 | 53% | $69,530 | $33,569 | $241,289 |
| 1963 | $302,491 | $45,374 | 53% | $81,498 | $39,347 | $203,597 |
| 1962 | $393,021 | $58,953 | 53% | $86,545 | $70,467 | $160,989 |
| 1961 | $294,790 | $44,219 | 53% | $79,423 | $38,345 | $88,726 |
| 1960 | $263,269 | $39,490 | 53% | $70,931 | $34,245 | $49,380 |
| 1959 | $99,117 | $14,867 | 53% | $31,234 | $8,363 | $14,835 |
| 1958 | $1,527 | $229 | 53% | $551 | $59 | $6,343 |
| 1957 | $1,527 | $229 | 53% | $551 | $59 | $6,160 |
| 1956 | $1,527 | $229 | 53% | $551 | $59 | $5,980 |
| 1955 | $68,777 | $10,317 | 53% | $21,673 | $5,803 | $5,803 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Jane Fonda)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Jane’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jane Fonda's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jane Fonda's net worth is an estimated $345.2 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jane Fonda make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Jane Fonda's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Jane actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Jane Fonda make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Jane lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Jane Fonda rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $345.2 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jane Fonda's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $274.4 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jane Fonda make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jane: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.