Karen Gillan Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Karen Gillan has an estimated net worth of $145.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | November 28, 1987 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Inverness |
| Breakthrough | A Touch of Cloth (2014) |
| Best Known | Avengers: Endgame (2019) |
Who Is Karen Gillan?
Karen Gillan was born November 28, 1987 in Inverness, best known for Avengers: Endgame (2019). The earnings behind Karen's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Karen's earning years from 2005 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2019 at about $52.4 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $145.9 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (36 of 61 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $271,446,622 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (7 of 61 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $13,850,359 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (18 of 61 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $16,476,495 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 28 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 15 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $34,970,341 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 37 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $77,425,825 |
| TV: Rebus Teri Cotter; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Doctor Who Soothsayer; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Stacked Ginny Turner; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Harley Street Holly; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Coming Up Anna; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Kevin Bishop Show Various; series episode total for a full-run credit; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,800,000 |
| TV: The Well Coll; estimated ~12 episodes per credited year (no published count); broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,800,000 |
| TV: Doctor Who Prom (2010) Herself; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: We'll Take Manhattan Jean Shrimpton; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: In Love With... Laura; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: NTSF:SD:SUV:: Daisy; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $7,500,000 |
| TV: A Touch of Cloth Kerry Newblood; series episode total for a full-run credit; news format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $180,000 |
| TV: Selfie Eliza Dooley; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $3,250,000 |
| TV: Comedy Bang! Bang! Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: 7 Days in Hell Lily Allsworth; one engagement for a television film or special; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Robot Chicken Various; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Emo Dad Jessica; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $375,000 |
| TV: Neurotica Chloe; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Cake Herself; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $15,000 |
| TV: Calls Sara; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: What If...? Nebula; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $48,000 |
| TV: The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special Nebula; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: The Simpsons Maisie MacWeldon-MacDougal; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Marvel Studios: Assembled Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Douglas Is Cancelled Madeline Crow; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,000,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $48,556,332 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$63,881,438 |
| Taxes Lãi suất hiệu dụng của Anh theo từng năm | -$144,797,927 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$119,828,403 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $145,924,819 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highlander no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2026 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $12,900,000 | $2,849,254 |
| Jumanji: Open World no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,496,678 |
| Douglas Is Cancelled no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,487,409 |
| Sleeping Dogs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2024 | Lead | $2,100,000 | $2,100,000 | $315,000 |
| The Life of Chuck no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $21,300,000 | $10,487,409 |
| Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2023 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $845,555,777 | $17,956,605 |
| Late Bloomers no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,475,506 |
| The Simpsons no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $2,844,421 |
| Dual no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M | 2022 | Lead | $4,500,000 | $425,909 | $674,760 |
| Next Exit no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $4,742 | $10,452,403 |
| The Bubble no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,452,403 |
| Thor: Tình yêu và sấm sét no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2022 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $760,928,081 | $17,915,677 |
| Calls no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,828,981 |
| Gunpowder Milkshake no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $4.5M | 2021 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $1,000,000 | $4,463,124 |
| Cake no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,809,419 |
| The Call of the Wild no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2020 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $107,604,626 | $16,140,471 |
| Avengers: Hồi kết no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2019 | Lead | $356,000,000 | $2,797,501,328 | $15,239,636 |
| Jumanji: The Next Level no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M | 2019 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $800,059,707 | $18,121,375 |
| Neurotica no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,802,801 |
| Spies in Disguise no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $171,600,000 | $2,334,554 |
| Stuber no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2019 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $32,299,999 | $2,611,304 |
| The Hoarding no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,802,801 |
| All Creatures Here Below no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,628,052 |
| Avengers: Cuộc chiến vô cực no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2018 | Lead | $400,000,000 | $2,048,359,754 | $14,770,330 |
| The Party's Just Beginning no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2018 | Lead | $4,371 | $4,371 | $656 |
| Alex & the List no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,317,563 |
| Những người bảo vệ thiên hà Vol. 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2017 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $863,756,051 | $13,936,486 |
| Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.5M | 2017 | Lead | $90,000,000 | $962,102,237 | $11,950,362 |
| Vòng Tròn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2017 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $33,900,000 | $2,393,052 |
| Emo Dad soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,102,004 |
| In a Valley of Violence soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $61,797 | $4,805,716 |
| 7 Days in Hell soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Hài Bang! Bang! soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $965,490 |
| Coward soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Fun Size Horror: Volume Two soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Robot Chicken soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $965,490 |
| The Big Short soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $133,346,506 | $2,868,469 |
| Warning Labels soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| A Touch of Cloth soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,137,500 |
| Bound for Greatness soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,137,500 |
| Guardians of the Galaxy soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $170,000,000 | $772,776,600 | $10,250,000 |
| Happy Idiot soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,137,500 |
| Selfie soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $355,315 | $3,137,500 |
| American Airlines Theatre soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,217,170 |
| NTSF:SD:SUV:: soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,217,170 |
| Not Another Happy Ending soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,217,170 |
| Oculus soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $44,400,000 | $337,027 |
| In Love With... soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,469,284 |
| Inadmissible Evidence no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $957,437 |
| Doctor Who Prom (2010) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 2010 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $342,893 |
| Doctor Who: Evacuation Earth no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| Doctor Who: Return to Earth no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| Outcast no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| Doctor Who no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Well no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Coming Up no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| Doctor Who no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| Harley Street no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| Stacked no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| The Kevin Bishop Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| Rebus no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $15,745,101 | $2,361,765 | 40% | $4,426,137 | $3,603,865 | $145,924,819 |
| 2025 | $11,535,416 | $1,730,312 | 40% | $3,242,744 | $2,640,318 | $139,496,157 |
| 2024 | $24,856,867 | $3,728,530 | 40% | $6,987,564 | $5,689,439 | $127,030,205 |
| 2023 | $36,617,308 | $5,492,596 | 40% | $10,293,565 | $8,381,262 | $111,826,377 |
| 2022 | $43,872,902 | $6,580,935 | 40% | $12,333,199 | $10,041,981 | $94,431,772 |
| 2021 | $26,690,677 | $4,003,601 | 40% | $7,503,069 | $6,109,176 | $90,560,104 |
| 2020 | $27,375,161 | $4,106,274 | 40% | $7,695,486 | $6,265,846 | $77,500,682 |
| 2019 | $52,350,632 | $7,852,595 | 40% | $14,716,391 | $11,982,431 | $66,023,154 |
| 2018 | $36,050,495 | $5,407,574 | 40% | $10,134,227 | $8,251,526 | $48,519,303 |
| 2017 | $37,547,954 | $5,632,193 | 40% | $10,555,180 | $8,594,276 | $40,033,979 |
| 2016 | $21,563,949 | $3,234,592 | 40% | $6,061,885 | $4,935,729 | $29,086,549 |
| 2015 | $23,331,793 | $3,499,769 | 40% | $6,558,847 | $5,340,368 | $22,898,431 |
| 2014 | $31,402,862 | $4,710,429 | 40% | $8,827,721 | $7,187,738 | $17,135,853 |
| 2013 | $19,781,652 | $2,967,248 | 40% | $5,560,860 | $4,527,783 | $9,344,831 |
| 2012 | $3,738,227 | $560,734 | 40% | $1,050,860 | $855,635 | $4,386,619 |
| 2011 | $1,577,649 | $236,647 | 40% | $443,496 | $361,105 | $3,308,021 |
| 2010 | $2,247,918 | $337,188 | 40% | $631,917 | $514,521 | $2,837,278 |
| 2009 | $4,578,280 | $686,742 | 40% | $1,287,010 | $1,047,913 | $2,172,939 |
| 2008 | $3,553,656 | $533,048 | 40% | $998,975 | $813,389 | $1,020,378 |
| 2007 | $916,879 | $137,532 | 40% | $315,355 | $152,253 | $227,535 |
| 2006 | $387,613 | $58,142 | 40% | $133,317 | $64,366 | $72,365 |
| 2005 | $153,263 | $22,989 | 40% | $70,598 | $7,566 | $7,566 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Karen Gillan)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Karen’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Karen Gillan's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Karen Gillan's net worth is an estimated $145.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Karen Gillan make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Karen Gillan's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Karen actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Karen Gillan make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Karen lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Karen Gillan rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $145.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Karen Gillan's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $271.4 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Karen Gillan make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Karen: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.