Kate Beckinsale Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Kate Beckinsale has an estimated net worth of $184.4 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | July 26, 1973 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Chiswick |
| Breakthrough | Pearl Harbor (2001) |
| Best Known | Underworld (2003) |
Who Is Kate Beckinsale?
Kate Beckinsale was born July 26, 1973 in Chiswick, best known for Underworld (2003). The earnings behind Kate's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Kate's earning years from 1975 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2012 at about $28.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $184.4 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (49 of 87 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $314,989,717 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (6 of 87 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $11,387,729 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (32 of 87 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $17,009,628 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 41 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 26 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $14,229,388 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 58 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $35,745,531 |
| TV: Couples Child; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Devices and Desires Young Alice Mair; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: One Against the Wind Barbe Lindell; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Video Fantasies Rachel; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Anna Lee: Headcase Thea Hahn; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Cold Comfort Farm Flora Poste; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Emma Emma Woodhouse; one engagement for a television film or special; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Alice Through the Looking Glass Alice; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Punk'd Herself; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Widow Georgia Wells; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $3,200,000 |
| TV: The Late Late Show with James Corden Herself; guest default per credited year; talk format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $10,000 |
| TV: Guilty Party Beth Burgess; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $2,500,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $97,962,633 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$61,375,776 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$155,038,657 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$106,272,476 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $184,447,562 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stolen Girl no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| The Patient no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| Wildcat no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| Canary Black no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,998 |
| Dynamo Is Dead no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,849,999 |
| Fool’s Paradise no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,996 |
| Prisoner's Daughter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,992 |
| The Elder Scrolls Online: High Isle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,992 |
| Guilty Party no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,984 |
| Jolt no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,984 |
| The Late Late Show with James Corden no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,994 |
| The Widow no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,965 |
| Untouchable no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,994 |
| Farming no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,931 |
| Pride and Prejudice no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,987 |
| The Elder Scrolls Online: Summerset no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,931 |
| The Elder Scrolls Online: Morrowind no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,867 |
| The Only Living Boy in New York no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $2,100,000 | $5,999,867 |
| Love & Friendship no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M | 2016 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $21,200,000 | $449,985 |
| Rising Damp Forever no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,740 |
| The Disappointments Room no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2016 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $5,700,000 | $2,249,904 |
| Underworld: Blood Wars no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.2M | 2016 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $81,093,313 | $5,249,774 |
| Vanity Fair no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,740 |
| Absolutely Anything no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2015 | Lead | $6,300,000 | $6,300,000 | $944,927 |
| Stonehearst Asylum no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $3,200,000 | $5,999,014 |
| The Elder Scrolls Online no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,014 |
| The Face of an Angel no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,014 |
| The Trials of Cate McCall no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2013 | Lead | $250,000 | $250,000 | $37,500 |
| Contraband no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2012 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $96,300,000 | $3,747,731 |
| Republicans, Get in My Vagina no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,996,262 |
| Total Recall no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M | 2012 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $198,467,168 | $18,738,083 |
| Underworld: Awakening no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $10.5M | 2012 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $160,112,671 | $10,493,470 |
| Ellen von Unwerth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,973,499 |
| Everybody's Fine no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.1M | 2009 | Lead | $20,500,000 | $16,399,999 | $3,062,553 |
| Jet (band) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,973,499 |
| Underworld: Rise of the Lycans no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2009 | Supporting | $35,000,000 | $91,400,000 | $2,316,156 |
| Whiteout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.2M | 2009 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $17,800,000 | $5,227,102 |
| Nothing but the Truth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.7M | 2008 | Lead | $11,500,000 | $409,832 | $1,713,297 |
| Serge Gainsbourg no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,948,617 |
| Winged Creatures no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $39,171 | $5,948,617 |
| David Schwimmer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,900,795 |
| Snow Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M | 2007 | Lead | $1,500,000 | $402,858 | $225,000 |
| Vacancy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2007 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $35,400,000 | $2,807,170 |
| Click no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.8M | 2006 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $268,700,000 | $12,328,046 |
| Punk'd no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2006 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,261,599 |
| Underworld: Evolution no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.8M | 2006 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $113,400,000 | $6,534,179 |
| The Aviator no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2004 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $213,741,459 | $10,444,639 |
| Underworld no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,342,521 |
| Underworld: The Eternal War no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,342,521 |
| Van Helsing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2004 | Lead | $165,000,000 | $300,200,000 | $10,444,639 |
| Underworld soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.3M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $95,700,000 | $2,712,637 |
| Laurel Canyon soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,128,859 |
| Tiptoes soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,128,859 |
| Pearl Harbor soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $140,000,000 | $449,200,000 | $6,056,818 |
| Serendipity soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.2M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $77,500,000 | $2,342,188 |
| The Golden Bowl soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $5,700,000 | $1,073,028 |
| The Unforgettable Richard Beckinsale soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
| Brokedown Palace soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 1999 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $10,100,000 | $1,066,688 |
| Alice Through the Looking Glass no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| Amazing Grace no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| George Michael no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| The Last Days of Disco no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1998 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $3,000,000 | $363,243 |
| Diana Hendry no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $589,406 |
| Ladybird Books no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $589,406 |
| Romeo và Juliet no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $589,406 |
| Shooting Fish no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1997 | Lead | $3,495,209 | $6,548,401 | $80,814 |
| Emma no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $481,333 |
| Faithless no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $481,333 |
| Nick Grosso no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $481,333 |
| Rachel Billington no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $481,333 |
| Samuel Adamson no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $481,333 |
| Alexandre Desplat no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| Cold Comfort Farm no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| Haunted no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| Marie-Louise ou la permission no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| The Seagull no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| Yann Collette no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| Prince of Jutland no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $392,359 |
| Uncovered no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $392,359 |
| Anna Lee: Headcase no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $376,387 |
| Much Ado About Nothing no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1993 | Lead | $5,800,000 | $43,000,000 | $252,979 |
| Hay Fever no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $368,130 |
| Video Fantasies no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $368,130 |
| Devices and Desires no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1991 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $361,111 |
| One Against the Wind no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $363,875 |
| This Is Your Life no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $68,750 |
| Couples no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1975 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $68,750 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $1,770,114 | $265,517 | 45% | $456,134 | $371,395 | $184,447,562 |
| 2025 | $23,710,549 | $3,556,582 | 45% | $6,109,877 | $4,974,805 | $180,422,610 |
| 2024 | $18,305,009 | $2,745,751 | 45% | $4,716,945 | $3,840,647 | $163,535,701 |
| 2023 | $14,042,293 | $2,106,344 | 45% | $3,618,502 | $2,946,270 | $147,870,788 |
| 2022 | $20,235,092 | $3,035,264 | 45% | $5,214,300 | $4,245,606 | $133,017,888 |
| 2021 | $24,620,509 | $3,693,076 | 45% | $6,344,360 | $5,165,727 | $138,187,701 |
| 2020 | $7,259,187 | $1,088,878 | 45% | $1,870,591 | $1,523,079 | $122,691,531 |
| 2019 | $10,343,370 | $1,551,506 | 45% | $2,665,342 | $2,170,184 | $112,787,862 |
| 2018 | $13,125,771 | $1,968,866 | 45% | $3,382,327 | $2,753,970 | $99,978,650 |
| 2017 | $13,489,414 | $2,023,412 | 47% | $3,349,632 | $2,727,349 | $96,660,184 |
| 2016 | $18,819,178 | $2,822,877 | 47% | $4,673,096 | $3,804,944 | $87,288,967 |
| 2015 | $7,650,425 | $1,147,564 | 47% | $1,899,720 | $1,546,797 | $79,359,397 |
| 2014 | $14,718,373 | $2,207,756 | 47% | $3,654,802 | $2,975,825 | $75,967,168 |
| 2013 | $7,176,329 | $1,076,449 | 47% | $1,781,994 | $1,450,942 | $68,790,966 |
| 2012 | $28,816,154 | $4,322,423 | 43% | $7,695,538 | $6,265,888 | $61,668,073 |
| 2011 | $13,134,457 | $1,970,169 | 43% | $3,507,641 | $2,856,004 | $51,934,030 |
| 2010 | $1,558,035 | $233,705 | 43% | $416,083 | $338,785 | $47,263,123 |
| 2009 | $17,341,999 | $2,601,300 | 43% | $4,631,292 | $3,770,907 | $43,924,050 |
| 2008 | $18,136,626 | $2,720,494 | 43% | $4,843,502 | $3,943,693 | $36,651,756 |
| 2007 | $12,130,355 | $1,819,553 | 43% | $3,239,489 | $2,637,668 | $35,954,779 |
| 2006 | $19,748,504 | $2,962,276 | 43% | $5,273,964 | $4,294,186 | $31,872,338 |
| 2005 | $8,458,551 | $1,268,783 | 43% | $2,258,910 | $1,839,258 | $25,858,770 |
| 2004 | $28,031,787 | $4,204,768 | 43% | $7,486,068 | $6,095,333 | $23,175,462 |
| 2003 | $17,166,912 | $2,575,037 | 43% | $4,584,534 | $3,732,835 | $16,200,099 |
| 2002 | $12,263,197 | $1,839,480 | 46% | $3,102,599 | $2,526,209 | $11,354,457 |
| 2001 | $13,603,588 | $2,040,538 | 46% | $3,441,719 | $2,802,328 | $9,102,506 |
| 2000 | $5,583,991 | $837,599 | 46% | $1,412,754 | $1,150,298 | $6,302,888 |
| 1999 | $2,433,555 | $365,033 | 46% | $615,691 | $501,310 | $5,072,471 |
| 1998 | $2,865,861 | $429,879 | 46% | $725,065 | $590,365 | $4,268,173 |
| 1997 | $2,597,335 | $389,600 | 46% | $657,128 | $535,049 | $3,327,407 |
| 1996 | $2,670,225 | $400,534 | 46% | $675,569 | $550,064 | $2,495,952 |
| 1995 | $2,767,807 | $415,171 | 46% | $700,257 | $570,166 | $1,803,609 |
| 1994 | $1,450,812 | $217,622 | 46% | $367,057 | $298,866 | $1,086,237 |
| 1993 | $838,454 | $125,768 | 46% | $212,130 | $172,721 | $773,328 |
| 1992 | $887,713 | $133,157 | 36% | $266,183 | $216,733 | $567,382 |
| 1991 | $1,095,864 | $164,380 | 36% | $328,598 | $267,552 | $334,194 |
| 1990 | $0 | $0 | 36% | $0 | $0 | $59,754 |
| 1989 | $0 | $0 | 36% | $0 | $0 | $58,190 |
| 1988 | $0 | $0 | 36% | $0 | $0 | $52,149 |
| 1987 | $1,847 | $277 | 45% | $780 | $84 | $48,703 |
| 1986 | $1,847 | $277 | 55% | $638 | $68 | $46,902 |
| 1985 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $43,089 |
| 1984 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $38,092 |
| 1983 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $35,873 |
| 1982 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $35,027 |
| 1981 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $34,198 |
| 1980 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $33,385 |
| 1979 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $32,588 |
| 1978 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $31,807 |
| 1977 | $70,597 | $10,590 | 55% | $24,389 | $2,614 | $31,042 |
| 1976 | $1,847 | $277 | 55% | $638 | $68 | $27,864 |
| 1975 | $218,750 | $32,813 | 55% | $56,428 | $27,244 | $27,244 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Kate Beckinsale)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Kate’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kate Beckinsale's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Kate Beckinsale's net worth is an estimated $184.4 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Kate Beckinsale make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Kate Beckinsale's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Kate actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Kate Beckinsale make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Kate lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Kate Beckinsale rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $184.4 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Kate Beckinsale's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $315.0 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Kate Beckinsale make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Kate: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.