$110.1 Million
Kristen Wiig Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Kristen Wiig has an estimated net worth of $110.1 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | không có |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | không có |
| Breakthrough | career breakthrough modeled at 2011 |
| Best Known | Bridesmaids (2011) |
Who Is Kristen Wiig?
Kristen Wiig is best known for Bridesmaids (2011). The earnings behind Kristen's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Kristen's earning years from 2000 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2013 at about $32.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $110.1 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (47 of 101 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $180,684,257 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (19 of 101 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $30,137,089 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (35 of 101 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $26,220,329 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 17 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years | $5,415,769 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $26,835,882 |
| TV: The Joe Schmo Show Dr. Pat; stated episode count; reality format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $135,000 |
| TV: I'm with Her Kristy; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Drew Carey Show Sandy; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Herself/Various; stated episode count; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: 30 Rock Candace Van der Shark; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Flight of the Conchords Brahbrah; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Bored to Death Jennifer Gladwell; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $225,000 |
| TV: Ugly Americans Tristan; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: The Cleveland Show Mrs. Stapleton; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: The Looney Tunes Show Lola Bunny; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $875,000 |
| TV: The Simpsons Calliope Juniper; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: SpongeBob SquarePants Madame Hag Fish; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Portlandia Gathy; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Arrested Development Young Lucille Bluth; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $525,000 |
| TV: Drunk History Patty Hearst; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Spoils of Babylon Cynthia Morehouse; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,500,000 |
| TV: The Spoils Before Dying Delores O'Dell; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,500,000 |
| TV: Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp Courtney; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $225,000 |
| TV: The Last Man on Earth Pamela Brinton; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $375,000 |
| TV: Nobodies Herself; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later Courtney; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Big Mouth Jessi's vulva / Beatrice; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: The Royal Wedding Live with Cord & Tish! Sir Albert Langham-Kingsley; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Bless the Harts Jenny Hart, Maykay Bueller; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,050,000 |
| TV: MacGruber Vicki St. Elmo; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $6,000,000 |
| TV: Palm Royale Maxine Dellacorte-Simmons and Mirabelle; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $15,007,500 |
| TV: Sausage Party: Foodtopia Brenda; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $280,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $45,354,300 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$46,792,306 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$120,586,046 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$79,792,634 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $110,132,019 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cut Off no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,892 |
| Lorne no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Supporting | – | $449,135 | $2,999,892 |
| Masters of the Universe no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $170,000,000 | $113,250,000 | $1,971,358 |
| Gabby's Dollhouse: The Movie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $32,000,000 | $80,800,000 | $2,599,818 |
| Despicable Me 4 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $986,700,000 | $1,971,160 |
| Sausage Party: Foodtopia no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2024 | Supporting | – | – | $2,999,591 |
| Big Gold Brick no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2022 | Lead | – | – | $2,998,449 |
| A Boy Called Christmas no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2021 | Lead | $3,800,000 | $3,800,000 | $570,000 |
| Barb and Star no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,996,981 |
| Barb and Star Go to Vista Del Mar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | $32,825 | $2,996,981 |
| Jamie Dornan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,996,981 |
| Kristen Wiig, Annie Mumolo and the Barb and Star cast no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,996,981 |
| MacGruber no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2021 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $9,300,000 | $1,498,888 |
| Palm Royale no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,996,981 |
| Richard Cheese no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,996,981 |
| Gal Gadot no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Lead | – | – | $2,994,128 |
| Wonder Woman 1984 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2020 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $169,600,000 | $17,956,605 |
| How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $129,000,000 | $540,000,000 | $2,390,871 |
| Where'd You Go, Bernadette no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2019 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $11,000,000 | $2,687,628 |
| Bless the Harts no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Supporting | – | – | $595,575 |
| Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $2,973,217 |
| Big Mouth no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Supporting | – | – | $591,457 |
| Despicable Me 3 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $1,034,999,999 | $2,365,826 |
| Downsizing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $10.8M | 2017 | Lead | $72,000,000 | $55,000,000 | $10,614,742 |
| Mother! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2017 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $44,500,000 | $4,424,008 |
| Nobodies no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Supporting | – | – | $591,457 |
| The Last Man on Earth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Lead | – | – | $2,948,290 |
| Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Lead | – | – | $2,948,290 |
| Ghostbusters no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2016 | Lead | $144,000,000 | $229,000,000 | $19,328,319 |
| Lightningface no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2016 | Supporting | – | – | $583,639 |
| Masterminds no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2016 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $29,700,000 | $3,630,303 |
| Sausage Party no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $19,000,000 | $140,705,322 | $583,639 |
| Zoolander 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.9M | 2016 | Lead | $52,500,000 | $56,700,000 | $7,620,967 |
| A Deadly Adoption no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $2,813,214 |
| Nasty Baby no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | $79,800 | $2,813,214 |
| The Diary of a Teenage Girl no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2015 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $2,300,000 | $288,630 |
| The Martian no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $16.2M | 2015 | Lead | $108,000,000 | $630,161,890 | $15,179,984 |
| The Spoils Before Dying no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $2,813,214 |
| Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $2,813,214 |
| Fred Armisen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $2,657,292 |
| How to Train Your Dragon 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $145,000,000 | $622,000,000 | $2,173,514 |
| The Skeleton Twins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2014 | Lead | $1,000,000 | $5,800,000 | $147,020 |
| The Spoils of Babylon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $2,657,292 |
| Welcome to Me no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2014 | Lead | $636,819 | $636,819 | $95,523 |
| Anchorman 2: Truyền thuyết tiếp tục soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $173,600,000 | $6,039,740 |
| Arrested Development soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,400,250 |
| Despicable Me 2 soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2013 | Supporting | $76,000,000 | $971,000,000 | $2,003,644 |
| Drunk History soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,400,250 |
| Hateship, Loveship soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $3,800,000 | $83,008 | $477,169 |
| Her soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2013 | Supporting | $23,000,000 | $48,300,000 | $1,102,004 |
| Rodrigo Amarante soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,400,250 |
| Space Oddity soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,400,250 |
| The Lonely Island soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,400,250 |
| The Secret Life of Walter Mitty soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.5M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $90,000,000 | $188,300,000 | $10,788,089 |
| The Simpsons soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2013 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $2,003,644 |
| Girl Most Likely soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.4M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $2,600,000 | $2,600,000 | $300,100 |
| Jeff Bergman soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| Lola Bunny soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| Portlandia soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| Revenge for Jolly! soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| Bridesmaids soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.9M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $32,500,000 | $290,000,000 | $2,575,000 |
| Friends with Kids soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $13,000,000 | $812,500 |
| Gift of the Night Fury soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 2011 | Supporting | – | – | $362,500 |
| Paul soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $97,900,000 | $3,137,500 |
| SpongeBob SquarePants soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 2011 | Supporting | $30,000,000 | $141,100,000 | $797,500 |
| The Simpsons soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 2011 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $1,450,000 |
| All Good Things soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.0M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $1,800,000 | $1,199,439 |
| Date Night soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $152,300,000 | $3,129,138 |
| Despicable Me soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2010 | Supporting | $69,000,000 | $544,200,000 | $1,144,563 |
| How to Train Your Dragon soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2010 | Supporting | $165,000,000 | $494,900,000 | $1,144,563 |
| Legend of the Boneknapper Dragon soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2010 | Supporting | – | – | $286,141 |
| MacGruber soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $9,300,000 | $591,460 |
| The Cleveland Show soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2010 | Supporting | – | – | $286,141 |
| The Looney Tunes Show soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2010 | Supporting | – | – | $286,141 |
| Ugly Americans soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2010 | Supporting | – | – | $286,141 |
| Adventureland soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $9,800,000 | $17,200,000 | $677,619 |
| Bored to Death soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | – | – | $996,790 |
| Extract soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21) | 2009 | Supporting | $8,000,000 | $10,800,000 | $621,295 |
| Flight of the Conchords soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | – | – | $996,790 |
| Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21) | 2009 | Supporting | $90,000,000 | $886,700,000 | $896,356 |
| The Lonely Island soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | – | – | $996,790 |
| Whip It soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $16,600,000 | $840,334 |
| Forgetting Sarah Marshall no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2008 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $105,800,000 | $963,049 |
| Ghost Town no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2008 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $27,100,000 | $784,245 |
| Pretty Bird no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2008 | Lead | $3,750,000 | – | $479,925 |
| Semi-Pro no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2008 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $43,900,000 | $1,423,823 |
| 30 đá no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2007 | Lead | – | – | $633,203 |
| Knocked Up no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2007 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $219,100,000 | $696,540 |
| Meet Bill no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2007 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $346,592 | $487,023 |
| The Brothers Solomon no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2007 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $1,000,000 | $535,749 |
| Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2007 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $20,600,000 | $793,994 |
| The Enigma with a Stigma no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2006 | Lead | – | – | $555,939 |
| Unaccompanied Minors no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2006 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $21,900,000 | $596,860 |
| I'm with Her no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $492,331 |
| June no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $492,331 |
| Life, Death, and Mini-Golf no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $492,331 |
| My Life, Inc. no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $492,331 |
| The Drew Carey Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $492,331 |
| Melvin Goes to Dinner no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2003 | Supporting | – | $4,168 | $477,308 |
| The Joe Schmo Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | – | – | $480,912 |
| Carnata no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2000 | Lead | – | – | $470,403 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $11,344,609 | $1,701,691 | 45% | $2,923,347 | $2,380,258 | $110,132,019 |
| 2025 | $10,340,119 | $1,551,018 | 45% | $2,664,504 | $2,169,502 | $105,613,096 |
| 2024 | $10,619,682 | $1,592,952 | 45% | $2,736,543 | $2,228,158 | $96,420,247 |
| 2023 | $3,011,888 | $451,783 | 45% | $776,121 | $631,936 | $87,217,845 |
| 2022 | $3,621,122 | $543,168 | 45% | $933,112 | $759,762 | $79,472,230 |
| 2021 | $22,785,179 | $3,417,777 | 45% | $5,871,422 | $4,780,649 | $84,467,673 |
| 2020 | $22,672,881 | $3,400,932 | 45% | $5,842,484 | $4,757,088 | $73,498,555 |
| 2019 | $12,992,762 | $1,948,914 | 45% | $3,348,053 | $2,726,063 | $63,986,979 |
| 2018 | $6,583,632 | $987,545 | 45% | $1,696,510 | $1,381,338 | $55,368,940 |
| 2017 | $22,207,283 | $3,331,092 | 47% | $5,514,415 | $4,489,966 | $53,674,145 |
| 2016 | $32,447,360 | $4,867,104 | 47% | $8,057,186 | $6,560,350 | $45,705,382 |
| 2015 | $32,505,169 | $4,875,775 | 47% | $8,071,541 | $6,572,038 | $37,211,027 |
| 2014 | $20,742,403 | $3,111,360 | 47% | $5,150,662 | $4,193,790 | $29,912,343 |
| 2013 | $32,743,298 | $4,911,495 | 47% | $8,130,672 | $6,620,184 | $24,238,547 |
| 2012 | $21,641,000 | $3,246,150 | 43% | $5,779,368 | $4,705,697 | $16,134,394 |
| 2011 | $14,905,969 | $2,235,895 | 43% | $3,980,734 | $3,241,208 | $10,713,265 |
| 2010 | $9,048,925 | $1,357,339 | 43% | $2,416,573 | $1,967,631 | $7,195,741 |
| 2009 | $7,242,800 | $1,086,420 | 43% | $1,934,236 | $1,574,901 | $4,893,831 |
| 2008 | $4,519,713 | $677,957 | 43% | $1,207,018 | $982,783 | $3,029,517 |
| 2007 | $3,340,878 | $501,132 | 43% | $892,203 | $726,453 | $2,249,900 |
| 2006 | $1,750,913 | $262,637 | 43% | $467,592 | $380,725 | $1,457,384 |
| 2005 | $795,840 | $119,376 | 43% | $260,038 | $125,546 | $1,009,534 |
| 2004 | $1,783,159 | $267,474 | 43% | $476,204 | $387,737 | $852,924 |
| 2003 | $1,544,251 | $231,638 | 43% | $412,402 | $335,787 | $441,220 |
| 2002 | $287,466 | $43,120 | 46% | $104,080 | $27,867 | $96,022 |
| 2001 | $0 | $0 | 46% | $0 | $0 | $70,272 |
| 2000 | $470,403 | $70,560 | 46% | $145,613 | $70,302 | $70,302 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Kristen Wiig)
Tái tạo số này. Ước tính giá trị ròng phải được tái tạo theo cách của một phát hiện khoa học: cùng một đầu vào công khai và cùng một tỷ lệ được công bố sẽ luôn đưa ra cùng một câu trả lời. Ngân sách phim và doanh thu phòng vé là báo cáo công khai. Mọi mức lương, mức phí, thuế suất, tỷ lệ tiết kiệm và lợi nhuận chuẩn được tiết lộ đều được công bố kèm theo trích dẫn trên trang web của chúng tôi. trang phương pháp. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $110.1 Million.
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Kristen’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kristen Wiig's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Kristen Wiig's net worth is an estimated $110.1 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Kristen Wiig make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Kristen Wiig's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Kristen actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Kristen Wiig make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Kristen lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Kristen Wiig rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $110.1 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Kristen Wiig's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $180.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Kristen Wiig make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Kristen: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Kristen Wiig
Angelina Jolie
Bruce Willis
Christian Bale
Emma Watson
Hugh Jackman
Jason Statham
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Garner
Jodie Foster
Johnny Depp
Julia Roberts
Leonardo DiCaprio
Margot Robbie
Matt Damon
Mila Kunis
Morgan Freeman
Natalie Portman
Samuel L. Jackson
Sandra Bullock
Scarlett Johansson
Sylvester Stallone
Tom Hanks
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.