Nicole Kidman Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Nicole Kidman has an estimated net worth of $293.5 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | June 20, 1967 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Honolulu |
| Breakthrough | Days of Thunder (1990) |
| Best Known | Moulin Rouge! (2001) |
Who Is Nicole Kidman?
Nicole Kidman was born June 20, 1967 in Honolulu, best known for Moulin Rouge! (2001). The earnings behind Nicole's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Nicole's earning years from 1983 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2023 at about $52.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $293.5 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (76 of 110 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $505,500,155 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (7 of 110 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $13,064,585 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (27 of 110 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $7,202,807 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 56 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 22 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $23,900,245 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (3 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 3 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $48,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 39 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $54,126,144 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $160,068,886 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$95,396,551 |
| Taxes Tỷ giá hiệu dụng US-NY theo từng năm | -$243,093,861 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$164,103,722 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $293,451,757 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margo's Got Money Troubles no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Practical Magic 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| The Young People no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Holland no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Scarpetta no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| The Last Anniversary no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| A Family Affair no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Babygirl no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2024 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $36,900,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Expats no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Spellbound no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Perfect Couple no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2023 | Lead | $210,000,000 | $440,200,000 | $18,000,000 |
| Faraway Downs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2023 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $211,800,000 | $16,428,571 |
| Lioness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Love & Death no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Roar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2022 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $2,550,000 |
| The Northman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $68,605,207 | $10,500,000 |
| Being the Ricardos no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Nine Perfect Strangers no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| The Prom (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2020 | Lead | $187,430 | $187,430 | $28,114 |
| The Undoing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| Bombshell no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2019 | Lead | $344,000 | $761,000 | $51,600 |
| The Goldfinch (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $7.0M | 2019 | Lead | $46,500,000 | $10,000,000 | $6,974,999 |
| Aquaman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2018 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $1,148,528,393 | $19,999,996 |
| Boy Erased no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2018 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $12,000,000 | $1,650,000 |
| Destroyer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2018 | Lead | $10,700,000 | $5,600,000 | $1,605,000 |
| Great Performers: Horror Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,998 |
| How to Talk to Girls at Parties no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $385,733 | $5,999,998 |
| The Beguiled no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2017 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $27,900,000 | $1,499,999 |
| The Guardian Brothers no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $11,900,000 | $600,000 |
| The Killing of a Sacred Deer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $10,700,000 | $5,999,998 |
| The Upside no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.6M | 2017 | Lead | $37,500,000 | $125,900,000 | $5,624,998 |
| Top of the Lake: China Girl no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,998 |
| Genius no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2016 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $5,700,000 | $2,549,998 |
| Lion no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2016 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $140,300,000 | $1,799,999 |
| Photograph 51 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,991 |
| Queen of the Desert no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.4M | 2015 | Lead | $36,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $5,399,992 |
| Secret in Their Eyes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2015 | Lead | $19,500,000 | $34,900,000 | $2,924,995 |
| Strangerland no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2015 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $1,000,000 | $1,499,998 |
| The Family Fang no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $585,165 | $5,999,991 |
| Before I Go to Sleep no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M | 2014 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $15,100,000 | $3,299,990 |
| Big Little Lies no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,982 |
| Grace of Monaco no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2014 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $27,500,000 | $4,499,987 |
| Hello Ladies: The Movie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,997 |
| Paddington no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $326,100,000 | $5,999,982 |
| Stoker no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2013 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $12,100,000 | $1,799,990 |
| The Railway Man (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2013 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $22,300,000 | $2,699,984 |
| Hemingway & Gellhorn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,931 |
| The Paperboy (2012 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M | 2012 | Lead | $12,500,000 | $3,700,000 | $1,874,979 |
| Just Go with It no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $12.0M | 2011 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $215,000,000 | $11,999,732 |
| Monte Carlo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.0M | 2011 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $39,700,000 | $2,999,936 |
| Trespass no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.8M | 2011 | Lead | $38,700,000 | $10,100,000 | $5,804,871 |
| Rabbit Hole no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M | 2010 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $6,200,000 | $449,985 |
| Nine no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,512 |
| Australia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2008 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $211,800,000 | $11,816,198 |
| Margot at the Wedding no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2007 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $2,900,000 | $1,499,654 |
| The Golden Compass (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2007 | Lead | $180,000,000 | $372,000,000 | $11,814,318 |
| The Invasion (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.9M | 2007 | Lead | $72,500,000 | $40,200,000 | $10,871,521 |
| Fur no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2006 | Lead | $16,800,000 | $2,300,000 | $2,518,661 |
| Happy Feet no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2006 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $384,300,000 | $1,417,449 |
| The Queen no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2006 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | $123,500,000 | $2,248,837 |
| Bewitched no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.8M | 2005 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $131,400,000 | $12,734,430 |
| The Interpreter (2005 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.0M | 2005 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $162,900,000 | $11,985,383 |
| Birth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.0M | 2004 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $23,900,000 | $2,993,780 |
| No. 5 the Film no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $33,000,000 | – | $2,320,449 |
| The Stepford Wives (2004 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $14.2M | 2004 | Lead | $95,000,000 | $103,300,000 | $14,216,001 |
| Cold Mountain no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.8M | 2003 | Lead | $79,000,000 | $173,000,000 | $11,795,466 |
| Dogville no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2003 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $16,680,836 | $1,495,045 |
| In the Cut no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2003 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $23,700,000 | $1,793,604 |
| The Human Stain (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2003 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $24,900,000 | $4,480,706 |
| Panic Room no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2002 | Supporting | $48,000,000 | $196,397,415 | $2,307,853 |
| The Hours (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M | 2002 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $108,800,000 | $3,719,578 |
| Birthday Girl no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M | 2001 | Lead | $13,000,000 | $16,200,000 | $1,923,358 |
| Moulin Rouge! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $7.5M | 2001 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $179,000,000 | $7,374,097 |
| Somethin' Stupid no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,900,795 |
| The Others (2001 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2001 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $210,000,000 | $2,512,566 |
| Eyes Wide Shut no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $9.8M | 1999 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $162,357,699 | $9,140,264 |
| Practical Magic no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $11.2M | 1998 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $68,000,000 | $9,952,476 |
| The Blue Room (play) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,477,947 |
| The Peacemaker (1997 film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $7.5M vs early terms | 1997 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $110,400,000 | $6,011,578 |
| The Portrait of a Lady (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $2,698,866 |
| Batman Forever soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $12.8M shrunk median for 1990s/tentpole (n=1) vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $336,567,158 | $6,577,083 |
| To Die For soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $41,000,000 | $1,679,688 |
| Malice soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $61,000,000 | $910,232 |
| My Life soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.6M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $17,500,000 | $54,000,000 | $745,445 |
| Far and Away no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1992 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $137,800,000 | $1,394,317 |
| Billy Bathgate no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1991 | Lead | $48,000,000 | $15,500,000 | $803,805 |
| Flirting no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $589,406 |
| Days of Thunder no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1990 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $157,900,000 | $662,434 |
| Bangkok Hilton no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $139,041 |
| Dead Calm no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1989 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $10,200,000 | $128,249 |
| Emerald City no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1988 | Lead | $2,800,000 | $192,831 | $72,022 |
| Nightmaster no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1988 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $121,728 |
| Steel Magnolias no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1988 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $96,800,000 | $123,125 |
| An Australian in Rome no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $112,719 |
| The Bit Part no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate) | 1987 | Supporting | $1,100,000 | – | $69,212 |
| Vietnam no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $112,719 |
| Windrider no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1986 | Lead | $2,500,000 | $19,367 | $69,507 |
| Archer no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $105,663 |
| Five Mile Creek no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $105,663 |
| Wills & Burke no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | $1,750,000 | $54,000 | $68,996 |
| Winners no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $105,663 |
| A Country Practice no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $104,429 |
| Chase Through the Night no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $104,429 |
| Matthew and Son no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $104,429 |
| Skin Deep no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $104,429 |
| BMX Bandits no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1983 | Lead | $1,050,000 | $1,000,000 | $68,780 |
| Bop Girl no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1983 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $103,795 |
| Bush Christmas no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1983 | Lead | $950,000 | $122,035 | $68,775 |
| Moving Pictures (band) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1983 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $103,795 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $25,869,851 | $3,880,478 | 45% | $6,666,298 | $5,427,857 | $293,451,757 |
| 2025 | $35,632,577 | $5,344,887 | 45% | $9,182,016 | $7,476,214 | $282,307,180 |
| 2024 | $39,233,422 | $5,885,013 | 45% | $10,109,904 | $8,231,721 | $256,171,200 |
| 2023 | $52,757,975 | $7,913,696 | 45% | $13,594,992 | $11,069,362 | $229,581,350 |
| 2022 | $27,852,807 | $4,177,921 | 45% | $7,177,279 | $5,843,909 | $200,559,598 |
| 2021 | $13,423,863 | $2,013,580 | 45% | $3,459,142 | $2,816,514 | $208,952,680 |
| 2020 | $20,888,124 | $3,133,219 | 45% | $5,382,577 | $4,382,621 | $190,127,699 |
| 2019 | $14,276,115 | $2,141,417 | 45% | $3,678,755 | $2,995,329 | $172,898,060 |
| 2018 | $21,011,137 | $3,151,671 | 45% | $5,414,276 | $4,408,431 | $153,561,763 |
| 2017 | $30,794,619 | $4,619,193 | 47% | $7,646,784 | $6,226,192 | $148,287,335 |
| 2016 | $14,265,460 | $2,139,819 | 47% | $3,542,336 | $2,884,254 | $132,013,159 |
| 2015 | $18,287,763 | $2,743,164 | 47% | $4,541,137 | $3,697,500 | $122,749,142 |
| 2014 | $22,814,379 | $3,422,157 | 47% | $5,665,166 | $4,612,712 | $116,228,169 |
| 2013 | $10,945,753 | $1,641,863 | 47% | $2,718,001 | $2,213,061 | $105,192,409 |
| 2012 | $8,342,629 | $1,251,394 | 43% | $2,227,953 | $1,814,051 | $94,305,548 |
| 2011 | $18,530,757 | $2,779,614 | 43% | $4,948,757 | $4,029,395 | $86,701,566 |
| 2010 | $8,113,974 | $1,217,096 | 43% | $2,166,889 | $1,764,332 | $79,614,957 |
| 2009 | $6,320,693 | $948,104 | 43% | $1,687,981 | $1,374,394 | $72,872,948 |
| 2008 | $11,927,446 | $1,789,117 | 43% | $3,185,301 | $2,593,547 | $65,263,820 |
| 2007 | $22,234,200 | $3,335,130 | 43% | $5,937,785 | $4,834,684 | $68,891,143 |
| 2006 | $13,032,053 | $1,954,808 | 43% | $3,480,293 | $2,833,737 | $61,278,695 |
| 2005 | $20,873,621 | $3,131,043 | 43% | $5,574,434 | $4,538,835 | $54,801,161 |
| 2004 | $22,528,117 | $3,379,218 | 43% | $6,016,278 | $4,898,595 | $48,496,098 |
| 2003 | $21,277,415 | $3,191,612 | 43% | $5,682,270 | $4,626,638 | $41,351,202 |
| 2002 | $11,582,700 | $1,737,405 | 46% | $2,930,432 | $2,386,027 | $33,446,590 |
| 2001 | $15,483,921 | $2,322,588 | 46% | $3,917,444 | $3,189,675 | $32,025,491 |
| 2000 | $6,246,474 | $936,971 | 46% | $1,580,363 | $1,286,769 | $28,848,220 |
| 1999 | $7,363,282 | $1,104,492 | 46% | $1,862,916 | $1,516,830 | $27,132,888 |
| 1998 | $24,942,475 | $3,741,371 | 46% | $6,310,466 | $5,138,130 | $23,918,167 |
| 1997 | $21,329,100 | $3,199,365 | 46% | $5,396,279 | $4,393,778 | $16,990,780 |
| 1996 | $16,659,960 | $2,498,994 | 46% | $4,214,983 | $3,431,938 | $11,259,840 |
| 1995 | $19,361,027 | $2,904,154 | 46% | $4,898,355 | $3,988,356 | $7,255,545 |
| 1994 | $2,901,281 | $435,192 | 46% | $734,026 | $597,661 | $2,877,265 |
| 1993 | $1,534,640 | $230,196 | 46% | $388,265 | $316,135 | $2,238,944 |
| 1992 | $1,766,538 | $264,981 | 36% | $529,701 | $431,295 | $1,816,443 |
| 1991 | $1,675,773 | $251,366 | 36% | $502,485 | $409,135 | $1,320,143 |
| 1990 | $1,070,105 | $160,516 | 36% | $320,874 | $261,263 | $816,851 |
| 1989 | $558,682 | $83,802 | 36% | $167,522 | $136,401 | $541,049 |
| 1988 | $407,704 | $61,156 | 36% | $149,576 | $72,215 | $362,638 |
| 1987 | $387,800 | $58,170 | 45% | $122,266 | $59,030 | $271,230 |
| 1986 | $223,520 | $33,528 | 55% | $67,440 | $18,057 | $204,705 |
| 1985 | $464,685 | $69,703 | 55% | $119,869 | $57,873 | $171,727 |
| 1984 | $437,442 | $65,616 | 55% | $112,842 | $54,480 | $100,971 |
| 1983 | $345,144 | $51,772 | 54% | $91,011 | $43,940 | $43,940 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: public New York / Nashville footprint; NY rates as primary
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Nicole Kidman)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Nicole’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Nicole Kidman's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Nicole Kidman's net worth is an estimated $293.5 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Nicole Kidman make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Nicole Kidman's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Nicole actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Nicole Kidman make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Nicole lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Nicole Kidman rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $293.5 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Nicole Kidman's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $505.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Nicole Kidman make from endorsements?
The model counts $48.0 Million in career endorsement income for Nicole: 3 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.