Steve Carell Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Steve Carell has an estimated net worth of $159.4 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 16, 1962 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Concord |
| Breakthrough | Bewitched (2005) |
| Best Known | The Office (2005) |
Who Is Steve Carell?
Steve Carell was born August 16, 1962 in Concord, best known for The Office (2005). The earnings behind Steve's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Steve's earning years from 1991 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2007 at about $27.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $159.4 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (38 of 74 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $220,659,709 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (19 of 74 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $35,262,913 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (17 of 74 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $18,868,003 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 29 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 12 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $9,538,248 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 27 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $39,297,841 |
| TV: The Dana Carvey Show Various characters; stated episode count; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $600,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Gary; stated episode count; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,020,600 |
| TV: Over the Top Yorgo Galfanikos; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $900,000 |
| TV: Just Shoot Me! Mr. Weiland; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Himself (correspondent); stated episode count; talk format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $4,154,850 |
| TV: Strangers with Candy Teacher; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Watching Ellie Edgar; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $2,400,000 |
| TV: Fillmore! Mr. Delancey; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Come to Papa Blevin; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $600,000 |
| TV: The Office Michael Scott; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $11,178,000 |
| TV: The Naked Trucker and T-Bones Show Brian; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Life's Too Short Himself; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Simpsons Dan Gillick; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Web Therapy Jackson Pickett; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $225,000 |
| TV: Pawn Stars Himself; guest default per credited year; reality format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Ellen DeGeneres Show Gru; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Angie Tribeca credited role; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $13,996,500 |
| TV: Too Funny to Fail Himself; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Kelly Clarkson Show Himself (announcer); guest default per credited year; talk format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $10,000 |
| TV: The Morning Show Mitch Kessler; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,050,750 |
| TV: Space Force Mark R. Naird; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $12,757,500 |
| TV: The Patient Alan Strauss; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Four Seasons Nick; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $7,500,000 |
| TV: Mountainhead Randall Garrett; one engagement for a television film or special; news format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Rooster Greg Russo; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $77,319,071 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$58,360,087 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$147,434,401 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$101,163,251 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $159,428,578 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minions & Monsters no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $85,000,000 | $281,100,000 | $2,849,998 |
| Mountainhead no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,984 |
| Rooster no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,984 |
| Despicable Me 4 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $986,700,000 | $1,971,424 |
| IF no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $110,000,000 | $190,300,000 | $1,971,424 |
| Uncle Vanya no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,969 |
| Asteroid City no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M | 2023 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $53,857,743 | $3,749,980 |
| Minions: The Rise of Gru no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $90,000,000 | $940,000,000 | $2,849,973 |
| The Four Seasons no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,881 |
| The Patient no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,881 |
| Irresistible no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2020 | Lead | $471,962 | $471,962 | $70,794 |
| Some Good News no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,550 |
| Space Force no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,494 |
| The Kelly Clarkson Show no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,908 |
| The Morning Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,494 |
| Beautiful Boy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M | 2018 | Lead | $22,150,000 | $31,700,000 | $3,321,975 |
| Too Funny to Fail no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,820 |
| Vice no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.0M | 2018 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $76,100,000 | $8,998,536 |
| Welcome to Marwen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.7M | 2018 | Lead | $44,500,000 | $13,100,000 | $6,673,898 |
| Battle of the Sexes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2017 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $18,600,000 | $3,748,835 |
| Despicable Me 3 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $1,034,999,999 | $1,319,650 |
| Last Flag Flying no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $1,900,000 | $5,998,080 |
| Freeheld no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2015 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $1,700,000 | $1,048,824 |
| Minions no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $74,000,000 | $1,159,000,000 | $2,397,585 |
| The Big Short no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M | 2015 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $133,346,506 | $4,195,011 |
| Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M | 2014 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $100,600,000 | $4,190,295 |
| Foxcatcher no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.6M | 2014 | Lead | $24,000,000 | $19,200,000 | $3,591,779 |
| Neighbors no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $18,000,000 | $270,700,000 | $598,826 |
| Anchorman 2: Truyền thuyết tiếp tục no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M | 2013 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $173,600,000 | $7,466,367 |
| Angie Tribeca no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,972,493 |
| Despicable Me 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $76,000,000 | $971,000,000 | $2,390,871 |
| Pawn Stars no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,314,979 |
| The Ellen DeGeneres Show no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,314,979 |
| The Incredible Burt Wonderstone no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.1M | 2013 | Lead | $34,000,000 | $27,400,000 | $5,076,817 |
| The Way, Way Back no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M | 2013 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $26,900,000 | $746,997 |
| Hope Springs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2012 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $114,300,000 | $4,460,640 |
| Seeking a Friend for the End of the World no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2012 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $9,600,000 | $1,487,191 |
| The Simpsons no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $2,382,300 |
| Crazy, Stupid, Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M | 2011 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $142,900,000 | $7,374,097 |
| Mạng sống's Too Short no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,301,204 |
| Date Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M | 2010 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $152,300,000 | $7,983,050 |
| Despicable Me no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $69,000,000 | $544,200,000 | $2,334,554 |
| Dinner for Schmucks no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.9M | 2010 | Lead | $65,849,999 | $86,900,000 | $9,554,490 |
| Get Smart no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.0M | 2008 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $230,000,000 | $10,629,166 |
| Horton Hears a Who! no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $85,000,000 | $298,600,000 | $2,173,514 |
| Dan in Real Life soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 2007 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $68,500,000 | $3,068,763 |
| Evan Almighty soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2007 | Lead | $175,000,000 | $174,000,000 | $9,414,443 |
| Knocked Up soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2007 | Supporting | $25,000,000 | $219,100,000 | $1,941,030 |
| Stories USA soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,849,394 |
| The Naked Trucker and T-Bones Show soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,849,394 |
| American Storage soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,128,859 |
| Hammy's Boomerang Adventure soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2006 | Supporting | $80,000,000 | $339,800,000 | $1,755,437 |
| Little Miss Sunshine soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M vs early terms | 2006 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $101,100,000 | $951,928 |
| Over the Hedge soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2006 | Supporting | $80,000,000 | $339,800,000 | $1,755,437 |
| Bewitched soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.8M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $131,400,000 | $6,625,000 |
| Melinda and Melinda soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $20,100,000 | $3,242,188 |
| The 40-Year-Old Virgin soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $177,400,000 | $2,192,188 |
| Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $90,600,000 | $1,643,104 |
| Come to Papa soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
| Fillmore! soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2004 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,108,795 |
| Sleepover soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $10,100,000 | $818,595 |
| Wake Up, Ron Burgundy: The Lost Movie soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
| Bruce Almighty soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.2M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $81,000,000 | $485,000,000 | $2,930,289 |
| Outlaw Volleyball soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,634,981 |
| Street of Pain soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,634,981 |
| Outlaw Golf no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| Strangers with Candy no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $2,300,000 | $674,362 |
| Watching Ellie no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Homegrown no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1998 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | $77,910 | $372,097 |
| Just Shoot Me! no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $392,359 |
| Tomorrow Night no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1998 | Lead | $180,000 | – | $27,000 |
| Over the Top no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $16,057,580 | $376,387 |
| The Dana Carvey Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $368,130 |
| Curly Sue no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1991 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $33,700,000 | $359,675 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $7,434,991 | $1,115,249 | 45% | $1,915,893 | $1,559,965 | $159,428,578 |
| 2025 | $21,120,191 | $3,168,029 | 45% | $5,442,377 | $4,431,312 | $154,735,225 |
| 2024 | $18,047,388 | $2,707,108 | 45% | $4,650,559 | $3,786,595 | $140,098,964 |
| 2023 | $8,748,079 | $1,312,212 | 45% | $2,254,258 | $1,835,469 | $126,219,423 |
| 2022 | $23,828,665 | $3,574,300 | 45% | $6,140,313 | $4,999,588 | $114,164,883 |
| 2021 | $13,417,632 | $2,012,645 | 45% | $3,457,536 | $2,815,207 | $117,147,115 |
| 2020 | $13,903,746 | $2,085,562 | 45% | $3,582,801 | $2,917,201 | $105,452,929 |
| 2019 | $14,510,755 | $2,176,613 | 45% | $3,739,218 | $3,044,559 | $95,443,867 |
| 2018 | $24,522,349 | $3,678,352 | 45% | $6,319,066 | $5,145,132 | $83,512,493 |
| 2017 | $20,241,062 | $3,036,159 | 47% | $5,026,172 | $4,092,427 | $77,912,353 |
| 2016 | $10,022,306 | $1,503,346 | 47% | $2,488,695 | $2,026,354 | $68,598,643 |
| 2015 | $7,610,144 | $1,141,522 | 47% | $1,889,718 | $1,538,652 | $63,283,208 |
| 2014 | $10,443,513 | $1,566,527 | 47% | $2,593,287 | $2,111,515 | $60,280,198 |
| 2013 | $23,401,644 | $3,510,247 | 47% | $5,810,993 | $4,731,447 | $54,821,295 |
| 2012 | $16,602,900 | $2,490,435 | 43% | $4,433,911 | $3,610,194 | $45,870,853 |
| 2011 | $11,917,661 | $1,787,649 | 43% | $3,182,688 | $2,591,419 | $39,615,158 |
| 2010 | $19,740,322 | $2,961,048 | 43% | $5,271,779 | $4,292,407 | $35,654,602 |
| 2009 | $9,157,305 | $1,373,596 | 43% | $2,445,517 | $1,991,197 | $29,356,934 |
| 2008 | $16,179,608 | $2,426,941 | 43% | $4,320,868 | $3,518,152 | $24,979,421 |
| 2007 | $27,806,033 | $4,170,905 | 43% | $7,425,779 | $6,046,244 | $23,591,589 |
| 2006 | $19,915,104 | $2,987,266 | 43% | $5,318,456 | $4,330,412 | $16,784,504 |
| 2005 | $17,511,006 | $2,626,651 | 43% | $4,676,426 | $3,807,656 | $11,677,632 |
| 2004 | $10,820,642 | $1,623,096 | 43% | $2,889,722 | $2,352,879 | $7,593,423 |
| 2003 | $8,435,289 | $1,265,293 | 43% | $2,252,698 | $1,834,200 | $4,970,532 |
| 2002 | $4,228,519 | $634,278 | 46% | $1,069,819 | $871,071 | $2,856,388 |
| 2001 | $731,719 | $109,758 | 46% | $226,503 | $109,356 | $2,046,993 |
| 2000 | $1,320,395 | $198,059 | 46% | $334,061 | $272,000 | $1,938,471 |
| 1999 | $3,516,756 | $527,513 | 46% | $889,742 | $724,449 | $1,640,558 |
| 1998 | $821,306 | $123,196 | 46% | $254,235 | $122,745 | $855,387 |
| 1997 | $1,508,656 | $226,298 | 46% | $381,691 | $310,782 | $662,840 |
| 1996 | $1,051,375 | $157,706 | 46% | $265,999 | $216,582 | $314,688 |
| 1995 | $130,457 | $19,569 | 46% | $54,083 | $5,796 | $90,932 |
| 1994 | $20,018 | $3,003 | 46% | $8,299 | $889 | $74,975 |
| 1993 | $20,018 | $3,003 | 46% | $8,299 | $889 | $72,764 |
| 1992 | $20,018 | $3,003 | 36% | $9,836 | $1,054 | $67,899 |
| 1991 | $359,675 | $53,951 | 36% | $131,955 | $63,708 | $63,708 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Steve Carell)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Steve’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Steve Carell's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Steve Carell's net worth is an estimated $159.4 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Steve Carell make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Steve Carell's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Steve actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Steve Carell make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Steve lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Steve Carell rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $159.4 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Steve Carell's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $220.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Steve Carell make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Steve: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.